[petsc-users] Unable to read in values thru namelist in Fortran after using PETSc 64bit in linux
Matthew Knepley
knepley at gmail.com
Thu Sep 20 09:45:31 CDT 2018
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 9:58 AM TAY wee-beng <zonexo at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry I'm still a bit confused. My 64bit code still doesn't work once I
> use more than 1 procs. It just aborts at some point. I'm been trying to
> use ARM Forge mpi debugging tool to find the error but it's a bit
> difficult to back trace.
>
> So I should carefully inspect each mpi subroutine or function, is that
> correct?
>
> If it's INT, then I should use PetscMPIInt. If it's labeled void *, I
> should use PetscInt. Is that so?
>
MPI routines take void * to data and a datatype. You must use the MPI
datatype
that matches the data you have in memory. MPIU_INT matches PetscInt. MPI_INT
matches int or PetscMPIInt. You just need to use the matching thing.
Thanks,
Matt
> Thank you very much
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> ================================================
> TAY Wee-Beng 郑伟明 (Zheng Weiming)
> Personal research webpage: http://tayweebeng.wixsite.com/website
> Youtube research showcase:
> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC72ZHtvQNMpNs2uRTSToiLA
> linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/tay-weebeng
> ================================================
>
> On 19/9/2018 12:49 AM, Smith, Barry F. wrote:
> > PetscMPIInt (or integer) are for all lengths passed to MPI
> functions; simple look at the prototypes for the MPI function you care
> about and it will tell you which arguments are integer. The DATA you are
> passing into the MPI arrays (which are labeled void * in the manual pages)
> should be PetscInt.
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Sep 18, 2018, at 1:39 AM, TAY wee-beng <zonexo at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> In that case, does it apply to all MPI subroutines such as
> MPI_ALLGATHER?
> >>
> >> In other words, must I assign local_array_length etc as PetscMPIInt?
> >>
> >> call
> MPI_ALLGATHER(local_array_length,1,MPIU_INTEGER,array_length,1,MPIU_INTEGER,MPI_COMM_WORLD,ierr)
> >>
> >> Or is it ok to change all integers from PetscInt to PetscMPIInt?
> >>
> >> With the exception of ierr - PetscErrorCode
> >>
> >>
> >> Thank you very much.
> >>
> >> Yours sincerely,
> >>
> >> ================================================
> >> TAY Wee-Beng (Zheng Weiming) 郑伟明
> >> Personal research webpage: http://tayweebeng.wixsite.com/website
> >> Youtube research showcase:
> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC72ZHtvQNMpNs2uRTSToiLA
> >> linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/tay-weebeng
> >> ================================================
> >>
> >> On 18/9/2018 1:39 PM, Balay, Satish wrote:
> >>> https://www.mpich.org/static/docs/v3.1/www3/MPI_Comm_size.html
> >>>
> >>> int MPI_Comm_size( MPI_Comm comm, int *size )
> >>>
> >>> i.e there is no PetscInt here. [MPI does not know about PETSc
> datatypes]
> >>>
> >>> For convinence we provide PetscMPIInt to keep track of such variables
> >>> [similarly PetscBLASInt]. For eg: Check
> src/vec/vec/examples/tests/ex2f.F
> >>>
> >>> Satish
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018, TAY wee-beng wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I managed to find the error appearing after using PETSc 64bit in
> linux -
> >>>>
> >>>> call MPI_COMM_SIZE(MPI_COMM_WORLD, num_procs, ierr)
> >>>>
> >>>> I have assigned num_procs as PetscInt and I got 0 instead of 1 (for 1
> procs)
> >>>>
> >>>> Assigning num_procs as integer as the problem.
> >>>>
> >>>> Is this supposed to be the case? Or is it a bug?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thank you very much.
> >>>>
> >>>> Yours sincerely,
> >>>>
> >>>> ================================================
> >>>> TAY Wee-Beng (Zheng Weiming) 郑伟明
> >>>> Personal research webpage: http://tayweebeng.wixsite.com/website
> >>>> Youtube research showcase:
> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC72ZHtvQNMpNs2uRTSToiLA
> >>>> linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/tay-weebeng
> >>>> ================================================
> >>>>
> >>>> On 8/9/2018 1:14 AM, Smith, Barry F. wrote:
> >>>>> You can try valgrind
> >>>>> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/documentation/faq.html#valgrind
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Barry
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Sep 7, 2018, at 1:44 AM, TAY wee-beng <zonexo at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I found that I am unable to read in values thru namelist in Fortran
> after
> >>>>>> using PETSc 64bit in linux.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I have a parameter txt file which is read in using namelist in
> Fortran:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> namelist /body_input/ no_body, convex_body, motion_type, hover,
> wing_config
> >>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> open (unit = 44 , FILE = "ibm3d_input.txt" , status = "old", iostat
> =
> >>>>>> openstatus(4))
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> if (openstatus(4) > 0) then
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> print *, "ibm3d_input file not present or wrong
> filename."
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> stop
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> end if
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> read (44,nml = solver_input)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> read (44,nml = grid_input)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> read (44,nml = body_input)...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> After using PETSc 64bit, my code aborts and I realise that it is
> because
> >>>>>> the values have became NaN. Strangely, it does not occur in windows
> with
> >>>>>> VS2008.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I wonder if it's a bug with the Intel Fortran compiler 2018.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Anyone has similar experience?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Thank you very much.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Yours sincerely,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ================================================
> >>>>>> TAY Wee-Beng (Zheng Weiming) 郑伟明
> >>>>>> Personal research webpage: http://tayweebeng.wixsite.com/website
> >>>>>> Youtube research showcase:
> >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC72ZHtvQNMpNs2uRTSToiLA
> >>>>>> linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/tay-weebeng
> >>>>>> ================================================
> >>>>>>
>
>
--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20180920/4726c9e3/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list