[petsc-users] make: *** No rule to make target `chk_makej', needed by `all'. Stop.

[Samuel Lanthaler]

Thanks, Jose. I actually tried that before, but it turns out there 
probably was some kind of an issue already with the compilation of 
petsc; even though it looked like it had worked. Trying again, now.

Thanks,

Samuel


On 08.03.2018 22:14, Jose E. Roman wrote:
> Update the SLEPc repository and try again.
> When a change in petsc-master affects SLEPc, you have to allow one or two days for us to re-synchronize.
> Jose
>
>> El 9 mar 2018, a las 3:59, Samuel Lanthaler <s.lanthaler at gmail.com> escribió:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just been trying to compile SLEPC on a cluster, and am getting the following error message after I type "make":
>>
>>> ./configure
>> Checking environment... done
>> Checking PETSc installation... done
>> Checking LAPACK library... done
>> Writing various configuration files... done
>> Generating Fortran stubs... done
>>
>> ===============================================================================
>> SLEPc Configuration
>> ===============================================================================
>>
>> SLEPc directory:
>> /marconi/home/userexternal/slanthal/slepc-git
>>   It is a git repository on branch: master
>> PETSc directory:
>> /marconi/home/userexternal/slanthal/petsc-git
>>   It is a git repository on branch: master
>> Architecture "arch-complex" with double precision complex numbers
>>
>> xxx=========================================================================xxx
>> Configure stage complete. Now build the SLEPc library with (gnumake build):
>>    make SLEPC_DIR=$PWD PETSC_DIR=/marconi/home/userexternal/slanthal/petsc-git PETSC_ARCH=arch-complex
>> xxx=========================================================================xxx
>>
>>> make SLEPC_DIR=$PWD PETSC_DIR=/marconi/home/userexternal/slanthal/petsc-git PETSC_ARCH=arch-complex
>> make: *** No rule to make target `chk_makej', needed by `all'. Stop.
>>
>> Does someone maybe know what the cause of this could be? Make is correct in that there is no rule for chk_makej, but I'm assuming it should really be some kind of function? However, since I don't understand what the dependency on chk_makej exactly does, I'm a bit lost...
>>
>> Thanks for you help in advance!
>> Samuel
>>
>>