[petsc-users] Why PETSc needs PetscScalar datatype?

[Youjun Hu]

Thank Barry for the clarification.
In summary, application code developers should choose the specific
datatypes (PetscReal and PetscComplex) rather than the more general
datatype PetscScalar
because application codes usually have fixed datatype and the flexibility
provided by PetscScalar is for PETSc library developers and usually not for
application developers.
If an application developer uses PetscScalar to declare a variable that is
intended by the developer to be complex and is assigned a complex value
later in the code and then used in, e.g.,  MatSetValues, but it happens
that petsc is configured with --with-scalar-type=real
then, it is not possible for this error to be detected at compiling time.
If the developer specify PetscComplex, then this inconsistency can be seen
by compilers and hopefully an error message can be raised during compiling.

Conclusion: avoid using PetscScalar in application codes unless it is
absolutely needed (which is not common). The example application codes
provided in tutor folds of petsc often use PetscScalar, which is a little
misleading and should better be revised to use concrete datatypes.
Correct me if anybody finds this conclusion is not justified.

Cheers,
Youjun



On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 11:03 AM Smith, Barry F. <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

>
>   For a particular configuration (./configure --with-scalar-type= real or
> complex) the PETSc objects, such as vectors and matrices either contain
> real values or complex values. In the same running code it is not possible
> to have some vectors with real numbers and some vectors with complex
> numbers.
>
>   Depending on how you configure PETSc ./configure --with-scalar-type=
> real or complex the variable name PetscScalar becomes either PetscReal or
> PetscComplex. PETSc code is written with PetscScalar so we can reconfigure
> the same source code and have it work with real numbers or complex.
>
>    For users who just work with real numbers you can simply use PetscReal
> as your variable type. If working with just with complex numbers you can
> use PetscComplex. If you want to sometimes configure with real numbers and
> sometimes configure with complex (which is not common) you use PetscScalar.
>
>    Barry
>
>
> > On Aug 4, 2018, at 11:39 AM, Youjun Hu <youjunhu at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am just wondering why PETSc introduces PetscScalar datatype in
> addition to the PetscReal and PetscComplex.
> > Could someone help clarify the rationale behind this design?
> > I am primarily a Fortran guy. The additional datatype PetscScalar seems
> to only confuse me rather than provide me any flexibility.
> > Cheers,
> > Youjun Hu
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20180804/396d1bee/attachment.html>