[petsc-users] error running parallel on cluster
Dave May
dave.mayhem23 at gmail.com
Wed Apr 18 23:14:47 CDT 2018
On 18 April 2018 at 23:52, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 5:52 PM, Sepideh Kavousi <skavou1 at lsu.edu> wrote:
>
>> Mathew and Dave,
>>
>> Thank you so much it is working perfectly now.
>>
>
> Excellent.
>
> If you want your name to appear on the next PETSc release as a
> contributor, you
> can make a PR with this change :)
>
Here is a URL describing the PR's protocol for PETSc contribs:
https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/wiki/pull-request-instructions-git
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
>
>> Sepideh
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Dave May <dave.mayhem23 at gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 18, 2018 3:13:33 PM
>> *To:* Sepideh Kavousi
>> *Cc:* Matthew Knepley; petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov
>> *Subject:* Re: [petsc-users] error running parallel on cluster
>>
>>
>>
>> On 18 April 2018 at 21:06, Sepideh Kavousi <skavou1 at lsu.edu> wrote:
>>
>> Mathew
>>
>> I added the lines and I still have the same issue. It may be a silly
>> question but should I configure and install petsc again using this new
>> lines added? or changing the line is enough? the highlighted lines are the
>> lines I modified.
>>
>>
>> PetscErrorCode ierr;
>> DM dm;
>> DMTS_DA *dmdats = (DMTS_DA*)ctx;
>> DMDALocalInfo info;
>> Vec Xloc,Xdotloc;
>> void *x,*f,*xdot;
>>
>> PetscFunctionBegin;
>> PetscValidHeaderSpecific(ts,TS_CLASSID,1);
>> PetscValidHeaderSpecific(X,VEC_CLASSID,2);
>> PetscValidHeaderSpecific(F,VEC_CLASSID,3);
>> if (!dmdats->ifunctionlocal) SETERRQ(PetscObjectComm((Petsc
>> Object)ts),PETSC_ERR_PLIB,"Corrupt context");
>> ierr = TSGetDM(ts,&dm);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>> ierr = DMGetLocalVector(dm,&Xdotloc);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>> ierr = DMGlobalToLocalBegin(dm,Xdot,INSERT_VALUES,Xdotloc);CHKERRQ(
>> ierr);
>> ierr = DMGlobalToLocalEnd(dm,Xdot,INSERT_VALUES,Xdotloc);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>>
>> ierr = DMGetLocalVector(dm,&Xloc);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>> ierr = DMGlobalToLocalBegin(dm,X,INSERT_VALUES,Xloc);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>> ierr = DMGlobalToLocalEnd(dm,X,INSERT_VALUES,Xloc);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>> ierr = DMDAGetLocalInfo(dm,&info);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>> ierr = DMDAVecGetArray(dm,Xloc,&x);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>> ierr = DMDAVecGetArray(dm,Xdotloc,&xdot);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>>
>>
>> Don't forget to include these calls (in this order) after you are done
>> with the Xdotloc vector
>>
>> ierr = DMDAVecRestoreArray(dm,Xdotloc,&xdot);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>> ierr = DMRestoreLocalVector(dm,&Xdotloc);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>>
>> Failure to do so will result in a memory leak.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Sepideh
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 17, 2018 5:59:12 PM
>>
>> *To:* Sepideh Kavousi
>> *Cc:* petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov
>> *Subject:* Re: [petsc-users] error running parallel on cluster
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Sepideh Kavousi <skavou1 at lsu.edu> wrote:
>>
>> The reason I can not use your method is that the input arguments of
>> SetIFunctionLocal are the arrays of x,x_t instead of x,x_t vectors. In your
>> method which was:
>>
>> ierr *=* DMGetLocalVector(dm,*&*Xdotloc);CHKERRQ(ierr); ierr *=* DMGlobalToLocalBegin(dm,Xdot,INSERT_VALUES,Xdotloc);CHKERRQ(ierr); ierr *=* DMGlobalToLocalEnd(dm,Xdot,INSERT_VALUES,Xdotloc);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>> ierr *=* DMDAVecGetArray(dm,Xdotloc,*&*xdot);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>>
>>
>> You misunderstand my suggestion. I mean stick this code in right here in
>> PETSc
>>
>> https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/annotate/be3efd428a942676a
>> 0189b3273b3c582694ff011/src/ts/utils/dmdats.c?at=master&file
>> viewer=file-view-default#dmdats.c-68
>>
>> Then the X_t array you get in your local function will be ghosted.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>
>> I need to have the vector of Xdot, not the array. So I think I should use
>> SetIFunction instead of SetIFunctionLocal.
>>
>>
>> Sepideh
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 17, 2018 1:22:53 PM
>> *To:* Sepideh Kavousi
>> *Cc:* petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov
>> *Subject:* Re: [petsc-users] error running parallel on cluster
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 1:50 PM, Sepideh Kavousi <skavou1 at lsu.edu> wrote:
>>
>> Mathew,
>> I previously use DMDATSSetIFunctionLocal(user.d
>> a,INSERT_VALUES,(DMDATSIFunctionLocal) FormFunction,&user) in my code.
>> If I want to use your solution I can not use it because in the FormFunction
>> definition I must use arrays, not vectors.So to solve this issue I followed
>> two methods where none were able to solve it.
>> 1- in first method I decided to use TSSetIFunction instead of
>> DMDATSSetIFunctionLocal
>>
>> for this means first in the main function, I use TSSetDM and my form
>> function variables were as:
>> PetscErrorCode FormFunction(TS ts,PetscScalar t,Vec Y,Vec Ydot,Vec F,
>> struct VAR_STRUCT *user) {
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> ierr = TSGetDM(ts,&dmda);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>> ierr= DMDAGetLocalInfo(dmda,&info2) ;CHKERRQ(ierr);
>>
>> ierr = DMGetLocalVector(dmda,&Ydot_local);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>> ierr = DMGlobalToLocalBegin(dmda,Ydot,INSERT_VALUES,Ydot_local);CHK
>> ERRQ(ierr);
>> ierr = DMGlobalToLocalEnd(dmda,Ydot,INSERT_VALUES,Ydot_local);CHKER
>> RQ(ierr);
>> .
>> .
>> .
>>
>> }
>> But still, it does not consider vectors y,ydot,f related to dmda (problem
>> executing DMDAVecGetArray)
>>
>>
>> We cannot help you if you do not show full error messages.
>>
>> Why not fix the code with SetIFunctionLocal(), as I said in my last
>> email. I will fix PETSc proper in branch at the end of the week. I
>> have a proposal due tomorrow, so I cannot do it right now.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>
>> 2- in second method I decided to use DMTSSetIFunction
>> but still, FormFunction is in form of TSIFunction where we do not define
>> dm object and I think it does not understand dm and da are connected,
>> although I have used TSSetDM in the main function.
>>
>> Can you please help me what should I do?
>> Regards,
>> Sepideh
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Monday, April 16, 2018 9:34:01 PM
>>
>> *To:* Sepideh Kavousi
>> *Cc:* petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov
>> *Subject:* Re: [petsc-users] error running parallel on cluster
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:22 PM, Sepideh Kavousi <skavou1 at lsu.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I run with valgrind with the following command:
>>
>> /work/skavou1/petsc/debug/bin/mpiexec -np 2 valgrind --tool=memcheck -q
>> --num-callers=20 --log-file=valgrind.log.%p ./one.out -malloc off
>> -ts_monitor -snes_fd_color -ts_max_snes_failures -1 -ts_type beuler
>> -pc_type bjacobi -snes_linesearch_type nleqerr -snes_type newtontr
>> -ksp_gmres_restart 31 -sub_pc_type ilu -snes_monitor -snes_converged_reason
>> -ksp_monitor
>>
>>
>> Okay, I think this is coded wrong. The DMDA stuff ignores DMLocal and
>> only chooses to ghost the input vector X and not X_t
>>
>> https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/annotate/be3efd428a942676a
>> 0189b3273b3c582694ff011/src/ts/utils/dmdats.c?at=master&file
>> viewer=file-view-default#dmdats.c-68
>>
>> Unfortunately, this was done by Peter in 2012 and he is gone, so we can't
>> blame him.
>> It is true that very few people use spatial derivatives of X_t, but it
>> does make sense.
>> Right there, you want to add
>>
>> ierr = DMGetLocalVector(dm,&Xdotloc);CHKERRQ(ierr); ierr = DMGlobalToLocalBegin(dm,Xdot,INSERT_VALUES,Xdotloc);CHKERRQ(ierr); ierr = DMGlobalToLocalEnd(dm,Xdot,INSERT_VALUES,Xdotloc);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>>
>> ierr = DMDAVecGetArray(dm,Xdotloc,&xdot);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>>
>>
>> and it should work.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>
>> the valgringoutput is as following:
>>
>> ==39396== Invalid read of size 8
>> ==39396== at 0x402679: FormFunction (one.c:212)
>> ==39396== by 0x611AA5F: TSComputeIFunction_DMDA (dmdats.c:79)
>> ==39396== by 0x61349BD: TSComputeIFunction (ts.c:830)
>> ==39396== by 0x623DD1C: SNESTSFormFunction_Theta (theta.c:649)
>> ==39396== by 0x615E599: SNESTSFormFunction (ts.c:4569)
>> ==39396== by 0x600C84E: SNESComputeFunction (snes.c:2203)
>> ==39396== by 0x60A34B6: SNESSolve_NEWTONTR (tr.c:105)
>> ==39396== by 0x60246C0: SNESSolve (snes.c:4312)
>> ==39396== by 0x6237346: TSTheta_SNESSolve (theta.c:176)
>> ==39396== by 0x6237CA8: TSStep_Theta (theta.c:216)
>> ==39396== by 0x6153380: TSStep (ts.c:3548)
>> ==39396== by 0x615559D: TSSolve (ts.c:3731)
>> ==39396== by 0x403C95: main (one.c:303)
>> ==39396== Address 0x83f5158 is 8 bytes before a block of size 7,200
>> alloc'd
>> ==39396== at 0x4A05588: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:727)
>> ==39396== by 0x4D87516: PetscMallocAlign (mal.c:42)
>> ==39396== by 0x4D88DE0: PetscMallocA (mal.c:397)
>> ==39396== by 0x50AB230: VecGetArray2d (rvector.c:2167)
>> ==39396== by 0x589437E: DMDAVecGetArray (dagetarray.c:73)
>> ==39396== by 0x611A8ED: TSComputeIFunction_DMDA (dmdats.c:74)
>> ==39396== by 0x61349BD: TSComputeIFunction (ts.c:830)
>> ==39396== by 0x623DD1C: SNESTSFormFunction_Theta (theta.c:649)
>> ==39396== by 0x615E599: SNESTSFormFunction (ts.c:4569)
>> ==39396== by 0x600C84E: SNESComputeFunction (snes.c:2203)
>> ==39396== by 0x60A34B6: SNESSolve_NEWTONTR (tr.c:105)
>> ==39396== by 0x60246C0: SNESSolve (snes.c:4312)
>> ==39396== by 0x6237346: TSTheta_SNESSolve (theta.c:176)
>> ==39396== by 0x6237CA8: TSStep_Theta (theta.c:216)
>> ==39396== by 0x6153380: TSStep (ts.c:3548)
>> ==39396== by 0x615559D: TSSolve (ts.c:3731)
>> ==39396== by 0x403C95: main (one.c:303)
>> ==39396==
>> ==39396== Invalid read of size 8
>> ==39396== at 0x402689: FormFunction (one.c:212)
>> ==39396== by 0x611AA5F: TSComputeIFunction_DMDA (dmdats.c:79)
>> ==39396== by 0x61349BD: TSComputeIFunction (ts.c:830)
>> ==39396== by 0x623DD1C: SNESTSFormFunction_Theta (theta.c:649)
>> ==39396== by 0x615E599: SNESTSFormFunction (ts.c:4569)
>> ==39396== by 0x600C84E: SNESComputeFunction (snes.c:2203)
>> ==39396== by 0x60A34B6: SNESSolve_NEWTONTR (tr.c:105)
>> ==39396== by 0x60246C0: SNESSolve (snes.c:4312)
>> ==39396== by 0x6237346: TSTheta_SNESSolve (theta.c:176)
>> ==39396== by 0x6237CA8: TSStep_Theta (theta.c:216)
>> ==39396== by 0x6153380: TSStep (ts.c:3548)
>> ==39396== by 0x615559D: TSSolve (ts.c:3731)
>> ==39396== by 0x403C95: main (one.c:303)
>> ==39396== Address 0x18 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
>> ==39396==
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Sepideh
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Monday, April 16, 2018 8:44:43 PM
>> *To:* Sepideh Kavousi
>> *Cc:* petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov
>> *Subject:* Re: [petsc-users] error running parallel on cluster
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Sepideh Kavousi <skavou1 at lsu.edu> wrote:
>>
>> this is not used forghost points . my code is :
>>
>>
>> 1) You are using ghost points, since you use i-1 as an index
>>
>> 2) I was wrong. X_t should also be ghosted.
>>
>> Run under valgrind.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>
>> for (j=info2->ys;j<info2->ys+info2->ym;j++){
>> for (i=info2->xs;i<info2->xs+info2->xm;i++){
>> if (i==0) {aF[j][i].U=aY[j][i+1].U-aY[j][i].U ;
>> aF[j][i].p=aY[j][i+1].p-aY[j][i].p ;}
>> else if (i==info2->mx-1) {aF[j][i].U=aY[j][i-1].U-aY[j][i].U
>> ; aF[j][i].p=aY[j][i].p-aY[j][i-1].p ;}
>> else if (j==0) {aF[j][i].U=aY[j+1][i].U-aY[j][i].U;
>> aF[j][i].p=aY[j+1][i].p-aY[j][i].p ;}
>> else if (j==info2->my-1) {aF[j][i].U=aY[j-1][i].U-aY[j][i].U
>> ; aF[j][i].p=aY[j][i].p-aY[j-1][i].p ;}
>> else {
>> //derivatives of U and p
>> Px=(aY[j][i+1].p-aY[j][i-1].p)/(2.0*user->hx);
>> Py=(aY[j+1][i].p-aY[j-1][i].p)/(2.0*user->hy);
>> Pxx=((aY[j][i+1].p+aY[j][i-1].p-2.0*aY[j][i].p)/(hx2));
>> Pxy=((aY[j+1][i+1].p+aY[j-1][
>> i-1].p-aY[j+1][i-1].p-aY[j-1][i+1].p)/(4.0*hxy));
>> Pyy=((aY[j+1][i].p+aY[j-1][i].p-2.0*aY[j][i].p)/hy2);
>> Pxt=(aYdot[j][i+1].p-aYdot[j][i-1].p)/(2.0*user->hx);
>> Pyt=(aYdot[j+1][i].p-aYdot[j-1][i].p)/(2.0*user->hy);
>>
>>
>> if (((Px*Px)+(Py*Py))>0.0 ) { //
>> theta=PetscAtanReal(Py/Px);
>> thetax=(Px*Pxy-Py*Pxx)/((Px*Px)+(Py*Py));
>> thetay=(Px*Pyy-Py*Pxy)/((Px*Px)+(Py*Py));
>> }
>> else {
>> theta=PETSC_PI*0.5;
>> thetax=0.0;
>> thetay=0.0;
>> }
>> e=(1.0+user->epsilon*cos(4.0*theta));;
>> ep=-(4.0*user->epsilon*sin(4.0*theta));
>> epp=-(4.0*user->epsilon*4.0*cos(4.0*theta));
>>
>>
>>
>> Ux=(aY[j][i+1].U-aY[j][i-1].U)/(2.0*user->hx);
>> Uy=(aY[j+1][i].U-aY[j-1][i].U)/(2.0*user->hy);
>> Uxx=((aY[j][i+1].U+aY[j][i-1].U-2.0*aY[j][i].U)/(hx2));
>> Uyy=((aY[j+1][i].U+aY[j-1][i].U-2.0*aY[j][i].U)/hy2);
>>
>> U1=user->D*user->tau_0/(user->W*user->W);
>> U2= ((Px*Px+Py*Py)>0.0) ? user->a_p/sqrt(Px*Px+Py*Py) :
>> 0.0 ;
>> //U2=0.0;
>> P1= (user->W*user->hy*j-user->Vp*user->tau_0*t)/user->lT;
>>
>> aF[j][i].U=(U1*(-0.5*(Ux*Px+U
>> y*Py)+0.5*(1-aY[j][i].p)*(Uxx+Uyy))+U2*(1+(1-user->k)*aY[j][
>> i].U)*(Pxt*Px+Pyt*Py+aYdot[j][i].p*(Pxx+Pyy))+U2*(1-user->k)
>> *aYdot[j][i].p*(Ux*Px+Uy*Py)+0.5*(1+(1-user->k)*aY[j][i].U)*
>> aYdot[j][i].p-0.5*(1+user->k-(1-user->k)*aY[j][i].p)*aYdot[j][i].U)*hx2;
>>
>> aF[j][i].p=( e*e*(Pxx+Pyy)+2.0*e*ep*(thetax
>> *Px+thetay*Py)+(e*epp+ep*ep)*(thetay*Px-thetax*Py)+(aY[j][i]
>> .p-aY[j][i].p*aY[j][i].p*aY[j][i].p)-user->lambda*(aY[j][i].
>> p*aY[j][i].p-1)*(aY[j][i].p*aY[j][i].p-1)*(aY[j][i].U+P1)-(1
>> -(1-user->k)*P1)*(1.0+4.0*user->epsilon*cos(4.0*theta))*(1.0
>> +4.0*user->epsilon*cos(4.0*theta))*aYdot[j][i].p )*hx2 ;
>>
>> }
>> }
>>
>> Sepideh
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Monday, April 16, 2018 8:36:37 PM
>> *To:* Sepideh Kavousi
>> *Cc:* petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov
>> *Subject:* Re: [petsc-users] error running parallel on cluster
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 9:20 PM, Sepideh Kavousi <skavou1 at lsu.edu> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> I am solving a PDE where I have the spacial derivtive of the time
>> derivative of a variable. In the DMDATSSetIFunctionLocal function I
>> defined d(dY/dt)/dx as:
>> (aYdot[j][i+1].p-aYdot[j][i-1].p)/(2.0*user->hx)
>>
>>
>> I do not think that you get ghosted Ydot in that function.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>
>> on my workstation, it is working but on the cluster it gives an error. I
>> can not run with debugger on the cluster but I have checked and the error
>> is related to this part and I do not have any problem on cluster when
>> running in series. Can you please help me about it.
>>
>> the error is:
>> 0]PETSC ERROR: Caught signal number 11 SEGV: Segmentation Violation,
>> probably memory access out of range
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: Try option -start_in_debugger or -on_error_attach_debugger
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: or see http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/d
>> ocumentation/faq.html#valgrind
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: or try http://valgrind.org on GNU/linux and Apple Mac OS
>> X to find memory corruption errors
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: likely location of problem given in stack below
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: --------------------- Stack Frames
>> ------------------------------------
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: Note: The EXACT line numbers in the stack are not
>> available,
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: INSTEAD the line number of the start of the function
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: is given.
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: [0] TSComputeIFunction_DMDA line 63
>> /ddnB/work/skavou1/petsc/src/ts/utils/dmdats.c
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: [0] TS user implicit function line 829
>> /ddnB/work/skavou1/petsc/src/ts/interface/ts.c
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: [0] TSComputeIFunction line 815
>> /ddnB/work/skavou1/petsc/src/ts/interface/ts.c
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: [0] SNESTSFormFunction_Theta line 640
>> /ddnB/work/skavou1/petsc/src/ts/impls/implicit/theta/theta.c
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: [0] SNESTSFormFunction line 4564
>> /ddnB/work/skavou1/petsc/src/ts/interface/ts.c
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: [0] SNES user function line 2202
>> /ddnB/work/skavou1/petsc/src/snes/interface/snes.c
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: [0] SNESComputeFunction line 2187
>> /ddnB/work/skavou1/petsc/src/snes/interface/snes.c
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: [0] SNESSolve_NEWTONTR line 90
>> /ddnB/work/skavou1/petsc/src/snes/impls/tr/tr.c
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: [0] SNESSolve line 4203 /ddnB/work/skavou1/petsc/src/s
>> nes/interface/snes.c
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: [0] TSTheta_SNESSolve line 175
>> /ddnB/work/skavou1/petsc/src/ts/impls/implicit/theta/theta.c
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: [0] TSStep_Theta line 191 /ddnB/work/skavou1/petsc/src/t
>> s/impls/implicit/theta/theta.c
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: [0] TSStep line 3526 /ddnB/work/skavou1/petsc/src/t
>> s/interface/ts.c
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: [0] TSSolve line 3668 /ddnB/work/skavou1/petsc/src/t
>> s/interface/ts.c
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: --------------------- Error Message
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: Signal received
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: See http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/documentation/faq.html
>> for trouble shooting.
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: Petsc Release Version 3.9.0, unknown
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: ./one.out on a debug named mike1 by skavou1 Mon Apr 16
>> 20:11:44 2018
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: Configure options --with-cc=gcc --with-cxx=g++
>> --with-fc=gfortran --download-mpich --download-fblaslapack
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: #1 User provided function() line 0 in unknown file
>> application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, 59) - process 0
>> ==29057==
>> ==29057== HEAP SUMMARY:
>> ==29057== in use at exit: 560,151 bytes in 383 blocks
>> ==29057== total heap usage: 8,734 allocs, 8,351 frees, 4,449,350 bytes
>> allocated
>> ==29057==
>> ==29057== LEAK SUMMARY:
>> ==29057== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
>> ==29057== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
>> ==29057== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
>> ==29057== still reachable: 560,151 bytes in 383 blocks
>> ==29057== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
>> ==29057== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
>> ==29057==
>> ==29057== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
>> ==29057== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 8 from 6)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sepideh
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
>> experiments lead.
>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>
>> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.caam.rice.edu/~mk51/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
>> experiments lead.
>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>
>> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.caam.rice.edu/~mk51/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
>> experiments lead.
>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>
>> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.caam.rice.edu/~mk51/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
>> experiments lead.
>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>
>> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.caam.rice.edu/~mk51/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
>> experiments lead.
>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>
>> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.caam.rice.edu/~mk51/>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>
> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.caam.rice.edu/~mk51/>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20180419/9bc83476/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list