[petsc-users] block ILU(K) is slower than the point-wise version?

[Kong, Fande]

I found one issue on my side. The preallocation is not right for the BAIJ
matrix.  Will this slow down MatLUFactor and MatSolve?

How to converge AIJ to BAIJ using a command-line option?

Fande,

On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:

> "Kong, Fande" <fande.kong at inl.gov> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hong <hzhang at mcs.anl.gov> writes:
> >>
> >> > Fande,
> >> > Got it. Below are what I get:
> >>
> >> Is Fande using ILU(0) or ILU(k)?  (And I think it should be possible to
> >> get a somewhat larger benefit.)
> >>
> >
> >
> > I am using ILU(0). Will it be much better to use ILU(k>0)?
>
> It'll be slower, but might converge faster.  You asked about ILU(k) so I
> assumed you were interested in k>0.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20170307/fad512ba/attachment-0001.html>