[petsc-users] Error with SuperLU_DIST (mkl related?)
Eric Chamberland
Eric.Chamberland at giref.ulaval.ca
Sun Jan 1 06:45:52 CST 2017
Hi,
ok, using petsc-3.7.4 but with SuperLU_DIST 5.1.3
(--download-superlu_dist-commit=v5.1.3) fixed the issue!
Thanks to both of you and happy new year! :)
Eric
Le 2016-12-31 à 11:51, Matthew Knepley a écrit :
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Eric Chamberland
> <Eric.Chamberland at giref.ulaval.ca
> <mailto:Eric.Chamberland at giref.ulaval.ca>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am just starting to debug a bug encountered with and only with
> SuperLU_Dist combined with MKL on a 2 processes validation test.
>
> (the same test works fine with MUMPS on 2 processes).
>
> I just noticed that the SuperLU_Dist version installed by PETSc
> configure script is 5.1.0 and the latest SuperLU_DIST is 5.1.3.
>
> Before going further, I just want to ask:
>
> Is there any specific reason to stick to 5.1.0?
>
>
> Can you debug in 'master' which does have 5.1.3, including an
> important bug fix?
>
> Matt
>
>
> Here is some more information:
>
> On process 2 I have this printed in stdout:
>
> Intel MKL ERROR: Parameter 6 was incorrect on entry to DTRSM .
>
> and in stderr:
>
> Test.ProblemeEFGen.opt: malloc.c:2369: sysmalloc: Assertion
> `(old_top == (((mbinptr) (((char *) &((av)->bins[((1) - 1) * 2]))
> - __builtin_offsetof (struct malloc_chunk, fd)))) && old_size ==
> 0) || ((unsigned long) (old_size) >= (unsigned
> long)((((__builtin_offsetof (struct malloc_chunk,
> fd_nextsize))+((2 *(sizeof(size_t))) - 1)) & ~((2
> *(sizeof(size_t))) - 1))) && ((old_top)->size & 0x1) && ((unsigned
> long) old_end & pagemask) == 0)' failed.
> [saruman:15771] *** Process received signal ***
>
> This is the 7th call to KSPSolve in the same execution. Here is
> the last KSPView:
>
> KSP Object:(o_slin) 2 MPI processes
> type: preonly
> maximum iterations=10000, initial guess is zero
> tolerances: relative=1e-05, absolute=1e-50, divergence=10000.
> left preconditioning
> using NONE norm type for convergence test
> PC Object:(o_slin) 2 MPI processes
> type: lu
> LU: out-of-place factorization
> tolerance for zero pivot 2.22045e-14
> matrix ordering: natural
> factor fill ratio given 0., needed 0.
> Factored matrix follows:
> Mat Object: 2 MPI processes
> type: mpiaij
> rows=382, cols=382
> package used to perform factorization: superlu_dist
> total: nonzeros=0, allocated nonzeros=0
> total number of mallocs used during MatSetValues calls =0
> SuperLU_DIST run parameters:
> Process grid nprow 2 x npcol 1
> Equilibrate matrix TRUE
> Matrix input mode 1
> Replace tiny pivots FALSE
> Use iterative refinement FALSE
> Processors in row 2 col partition 1
> Row permutation LargeDiag
> Column permutation METIS_AT_PLUS_A
> Parallel symbolic factorization FALSE
> Repeated factorization SamePattern
> linear system matrix = precond matrix:
> Mat Object: (o_slin) 2 MPI processes
> type: mpiaij
> rows=382, cols=382
> total: nonzeros=4458, allocated nonzeros=4458
> total number of mallocs used during MatSetValues calls =0
> using I-node (on process 0) routines: found 109 nodes, limit
> used is 5
>
> I know this information is not enough to help debug, but I would
> like to know if PETSc guys will upgrade to 5.1.3 before trying to
> debug anything.
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
>
>
>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
> their experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20170101/31f1b5a7/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list