[petsc-users] Configuring PETSc for KNL

[Jed Brown]

Lawrence Mitchell <lawrence.mitchell at imperial.ac.uk> writes:

> On 06/04/17 12:25, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>>     I'm not sure whether getting the Intel acronyms mixed up (KNL vs MKL)
>>     makes the quote above better or worse.
>> 
>> 
>> Too cryptic. Are you saying that this cannot be what is happening? How
>> would you explain
>> the drop off in performance?
>> 
> I think Jed is being facetious about both KNL and MKL.
>
> Lawrence

Thanks.  Matt almost certainly meant to write KNL (the statement makes
sense in that context), but instead wrote MKL (not relevant in this
context).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20170406/bf020bd9/attachment.pgp>