[petsc-users] PCFIELDSPLIT question

Tue Feb 2 15:02:56 CST 2016

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Hom Nath Gharti <hng.email at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks again Matt. Unfortunately got the same errors with '0'. I think
> both are valid in Fortran.
>

Then you will have to go in the debugger and see why its not creating 4
splits, since this is exactly
what it does in our tests. This is how all the SNES tests that I use work.
I am sure its a Fortran
problem.

  Thanks,

     Matt

> Hom Nath
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Hom Nath Gharti <hng.email at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thank you so much Matt.
> >>
> >> I now tried the following:
> >>
> >> ======================================================
> >> call KSPCreate(PETSC_COMM_WORLD,ksp,ierr)
> >> call KSPGetPC(ksp,pc,ierr)
> >>
> >> call PCFieldSplitSetIS(pc,"0",gdofu_is,ierr);
> >> call ISDestroy(gdofu_is,ierr)
> >> call PCFieldSplitSetIS(pc,"1",gdofchi_is,ierr);
> >> call ISDestroy(gdofchi_is,ierr)
> >> call PCFieldSplitSetIS(pc,"2",gdofp_is,ierr);
> >> call ISDestroy(gdofp_is,ierr)
> >> call PCFieldSplitSetIS(pc,"3",gdofphi_is,ierr);
> >> call ISDestroy(gdofphi_is,ierr)
> >>
> >> ! Amat changes in each time steps
> >> call KSPSetOperators(ksp,Amat,Amat,ierr) !version >= 3.5.0
> >>
> >> call KSPSolve(ksp,bvec,xvec,ierr)
> >> ======================================================
> >
> >
> > I am guessing that "0" is not a valid string for your Fortran compiler.
> Are
> > you sure
> > its not single quotes '0'?
> >
> >   Matt
> >
> >>
> >> But I get the following error:
> >>
> >> [0]PETSC ERROR: --------------------- Error Message
> >> --------------------------------------------------------------
> >> [0]PETSC ERROR: Petsc has generated inconsistent data
> >> [0]PETSC ERROR: Unhandled case, must have at least two fields, not 1
> >> [0]PETSC ERROR: See
> >> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/documentation/faq.html for trouble
> >> shooting.
> >> [0]PETSC ERROR: Petsc Release Version 3.6.3, Dec, 03, 2015
> >> [0]PETSC ERROR:
> >> /tigress/hgharti/gitwork/SPECFEM3D_GLOBEVSPP/./bin/xspecfem3D on a
> >> arch-linux2-c-debug named tiger-r3c1n7 by hgharti Tue Feb  2 15:
> >> 29:30 2016
> >> [0]PETSC ERROR: Configure options
> >>
> --with-blas-lapack-dir=/opt/intel/composer_xe_2015.2.164/mkl/lib/intel64/
> >> --with-cc=mpicc --with-cxx=mpicxx --wit
> >> h-fc=mpif90 --with-mpiexec=mpiexec --with-debugging=1
> >> --download-scalapack --download-mumps --download-pastix
> >> --download-superlu --download-superlu_dist --download-metis
> >> --download-parmetis --download-ptscotch --download-hypre
> >> [0]PETSC ERROR: #1 PCFieldSplitSetDefaults() line 469 in
> >>
> >>
> /home/hgharti/lsoft/petsc-3.6.3-intel16-mpi5/src/ksp/pc/impls/fieldsplit/fieldsplit.c
> >> [0]PETSC ERROR: #2 PCSetUp_FieldSplit() line 486 in
> >>
> >>
> /home/hgharti/lsoft/petsc-3.6.3-intel16-mpi5/src/ksp/pc/impls/fieldsplit/fieldsplit.c
> >> [0]PETSC ERROR: #3 PCSetUp() line 983 in
> >>
> /home/hgharti/lsoft/petsc-3.6.3-intel16-mpi5/src/ksp/pc/interface/precon.c
> >> [0]PETSC ERROR: #4 KSPSetUp() line 332 in
> >>
> >>
> /home/hgharti/lsoft/petsc-3.6.3-intel16-mpi5/src/ksp/ksp/interface/itfunc.c
> >> [0]PETSC ERROR: #5 KSPSolve() line 546 in
> >>
> >>
> /home/hgharti/lsoft/petsc-3.6.3-intel16-mpi5/src/ksp/ksp/interface/itfunc.c
> >> forrtl: error (76): Abort trap signal
> >>
> >> Am I missing something?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Hom Nath
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Hom Nath Gharti <hng.email at gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi Matt, hi all,
> >> >>
> >> >> I am trying to use PCFIELDSPLIT for my solver which consists of 4
> >> >> different variables, namely, u (displacement vector), \chi
> >> >> (displacement potential), p(pressure), and \phi (gravity potential).
> >> >>
> >> >> My code segment looks like the following:
> >> >> ======================================================
> >> >> call KSPCreate(PETSC_COMM_WORLD,ksp,ierr)
> >> >> call KSPGetPC(ksp,pc,ierr)
> >> >> nsplit=4
> >> >> call PCFieldSplitSetBlockSize(pc,nsplit,ierr);
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > You do not need the statement above.
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> call PCFieldSplitSetIS(pc,"0",gdofu_is,ierr);
> >> >> call ISDestroy(gdofu_is,ierr)
> >> >> call PCFieldSplitSetIS(pc,"1",gdofchi_is,ierr);
> >> >> call ISDestroy(gdofchi_is,ierr)
> >> >> call PCFieldSplitSetIS(pc,"2",gdofp_is,ierr);
> >> >> call ISDestroy(gdofp_is,ierr)
> >> >> call PCFieldSplitSetIS(pc,"3",gdofphi_is,ierr);
> >> >> call ISDestroy(gdofphi_is,ierr)
> >> >>
> >> >> call PCFieldSplitGetSubKSP(pc,nsplit,subksp,ierr);
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > These SetOperators() calls are wrong. I am not sure why you want them
> >> > here.
> >> > Also, that means you do not need the call above.
> >> >
> >> >   Thanks,
> >> >
> >> >      Matt
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> call KSPSetOperators(subksp(1),Amat,Amat,ierr);
> >> >> call KSPSetOperators(subksp(2),Amat,Amat,ierr);
> >> >> call KSPSetOperators(subksp(3),Amat,Amat,ierr);
> >> >> call KSPSetOperators(subksp(4),Amat,Amat,ierr);
> >> >>
> >> >> call KSPSolve(ksp,bvec,xvec,ierr)
> >> >> ======================================================
> >> >>
> >> >> But I am getting the following error:
> >> >> [79]PETSC ERROR: Null argument, when expecting valid pointer
> >> >> [79]PETSC ERROR: Null Object: Parameter # 1
> >> >> [79]PETSC ERROR: #1 KSPSetOperators() line 536 in
> >> >> /home/hgharti/lsoft/petsc-3.6.3-intel16-mpi5/src/ksp/ksp/interf
> >> >>
> >> >> It looks like I am doing something wrong in "call KSPSetOperators"
> but
> >> >> I could not figure that out.
> >> >>
> >> >> Could anybody help me to fix this problem? I looked into almost all
> >> >> related examples but I could not really figure out the correct steps
> >> >> after "call PCFieldSplitSetIS".
> >> >>
> >> >> Any help will be greatly appreciated.
> >> >>
> >> >> Best,
> >> >> Hom nath
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Hom Nath Gharti <
> hng.email at gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > Thank you so much Matt! I will try.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Hom Nath
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 6:26 AM, Matthew Knepley <
> knepley at gmail.com>
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Hom Nath Gharti
> >> >> >> <hng.email at gmail.com>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Dear all,
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> I am new to PcFieldSplit.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> I have a matrix formed using MATMPIAIJ. Is it possible to use
> >> >> >>> PCFIELDSPLIT operations in this type of matrix? Or does it have
> to
> >> >> >>> be
> >> >> >>> MATMPIBIJ or MATNEST format?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Yes, you can split AIJ.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> If possible for MATMPIAIJ, could anybody provide me a simple
> >> >> >>> example
> >> >> >>> or few steps? Variables in the equations are displacement vector,
> >> >> >>> scalar potential and pressure.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> If you do not have a collocated discretization, then you have to
> use
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-current/docs/manualpages/PC/PCFieldSplitSetIS.html
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>   Thanks,
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>      Matt
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Thanks for help.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Hom Nath
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> >> >> >> experiments
> >> >> >> is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> >> >> >> experiments
> >> >> >> lead.
> >> >> >> -- Norbert Wiener
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> >> > experiments
> >> > is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> >> > experiments
> >> > lead.
> >> > -- Norbert Wiener
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments
> > is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments
> > lead.
> > -- Norbert Wiener
>

-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20160202/a1a18b22/attachment.html>