[petsc-users] Current state of OpenMP support in PETSc

[Douglas A. Augusto]

On 22/05/2015 at 13:20,
Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:

> We're also developing shared memory MPI-based approaches and would
> recommend that you plan to not use OpenMP (it's a horrible programming
> model -- oversynchronizing and without a concept of memory locality).

Thanks for the clarification. Does PETSc already take advantage of any of these
MPI-based shared memory approaches?


Best regards,

-- 
Douglas A. Augusto