[petsc-users] can MatGetSubMatrix extract remote rows?

[Fande Kong]

Thanks, Barry. I see.

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

>
> > On May 19, 2015, at 5:47 PM, Fande Kong <fande.kong at colorado.edu> wrote:
> >
> > If I am interested in extracting some remote and local rows and columns
> but as another sequential matrix, then I have to use  MatGetSubMatrices?
>
>   Yes
>
> > There are no ways to use MatGetSubMatrix to get a sequential matrix?
>
>   No
>
> > Because I am only interested in one sequential matrix per core not multi
> matrices.
>
>   You can just ask for one matrix with MatGetSubMatrices() will give you
> one sequential matrix per MPI process.
>
>
> >
> > Fande,
> >
> > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > > On May 19, 2015, at 5:33 PM, Fande Kong <fande.kong at colorado.edu>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I am confused with MatGetSubMatrix and MatGetSubMatrices.  In my
> understanding, I think MatGetSubMatrix extracts local rows and columns to
> form another parallel matrix with the same communicator, while
> MatGetSubMatrices extracts both local and remote entities to construct some
> sequential matrices. Is it right?
> >
> >   Yes except that MatGetSubMatrix can also use remote rows (and columns)
> for the part that is on a particular processor. That is it is not
> restricted to only grabbing local rows/columns in the new parallel matrix.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Fande,
> >
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20150519/3b7a9493/attachment-0001.html>