[petsc-users] Guidance on GAMG preconditioning
Young, Matthew, Adam
may at bu.edu
Mon Jun 8 12:25:34 CDT 2015
Thanks for your helpful comments, Jed, Matt, and Mark. They've given me some things to think about, so I'll work on those then open a new email thread when I have further questions.
--Matt
--------------------------------------------------------------
Matthew Young
Graduate Student
Boston University Dept. of Astronomy
--------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________________
From: Jed Brown [jed at jedbrown.org]
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 1:10 PM
To: Young, Matthew, Adam; Matthew Knepley
Cc: petsc-users
Subject: Re: [petsc-users] Guidance on GAMG preconditioning
"Young, Matthew, Adam" <may at bu.edu> writes:
> This is a problem from ionospheric plasma physics. The simulation
> treats ions via a particle-in-cell method and electrons as an
> inertialess fluid, the justification being that ionospheric ions are
> 10^4 times more massive than electrons. We further assume that the
> plasma is effectively neutral on the length scale of interest
> (i.e. quasi-neutral) and those assumptions allows us to write an
> elliptic equation for the electrostatic potential, phi: Div[n(x) T
> Grad(phi)]. n(x) is the quasi-neutral plasma density, which is updated
> via an ion gather at each time step, and T is a tensor of constant
> coefficients that looks like {{1, kappa, 0},{-kappa, 1, 0},{0, 0,
> 1+kappa^2}}, where kappa is the ratio of gyrofrequency to collision
> frequency for electrons (~100 for our problem)*.
It seems to me that the nonsymmetric part of T is not an elliptic
contribution so with your large value of kappa, you should think of this
problem as a singular perturbation. Consequently, there is no reason to
believe that methods designed for elliptic problems will work for your
problem (especially not "out of the box").
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list