[petsc-users] TAO IPM

[David Knezevic]

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Jason Sarich <jason.sarich at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi David,
>
> The IPM code is a naive implementation and not very battle-tested. There
> is nothing specifically broken, but the linear solve operator becomes very
> ill-conditioned and for most cases will require a direct solver (e.g.
> superlu). This is the major problem, and if you're ok with that then it may
> work for you.
> Unfortunately, we don't have anything else to recommend for generally
> constrained problems.
>


Hi Jason,

OK, understood, thanks very much for that info.

Best regards,
David
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20150423/203bd118/attachment.html>