[petsc-users] Putting petsc in a namespace
Florian Lindner
mailinglists at xgm.de
Mon Sep 8 02:19:21 CDT 2014
Hi there, ...
Am 05.09.2014 18:00, schrieb Jed Brown:
> Florian Lindner <mailinglists at xgm.de> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This may be rather a C/C++ question, but ...
>>
>> I encapsulate some petsc functions into c++ classes. Since I don't
>> want
>> to pull all petsc symbols into the global namespace for anyone using
>> my
>> classes I try to put petsc into it's own namespace:
>>
>> Header petsc.h:
>
> Note that there is already a petsc.h in the PETSc distribution. It is
> different from yours.
Ok, that may not be causing problems here, but it will certainly cause
problems in the future, renamed it to petnum.h / .cpp. Thx!
>> namespace petsc {
>> #include "petscmat.h"
>> }
>>
>> class Vector {
>> petsc::Vec vector;
>> }
>>
>>
>> Implementation petsc.cpp:
>>
>> #include "petsc.h"
>>
>> namespace petsc {
>> #include "petscviewer.h"
>> }
>>
>> using namespace petsc;
>>
>>
>> User:
>>
>> #include "petsc.h"
>> #include <petscksp.h> // if the user wants he can import parts of
>> petsc
>> of course
>>
>>
>> But this gives a massive amount of error messsages like:
>>
>> mpic++ -o petsc.o -c -O0 -g3 -Wall
>> -I/home/florian/software/petsc/include
>> -I/home/florian/software/petsc/arch-linux2-c-debug/include petsc.cpp
>> mpic++ -o prbf.o -c -O0 -g3 -Wall
>> -I/home/florian/software/petsc/include
>> -I/home/florian/software/petsc/arch-linux2-c-debug/include prbf.cpp
>> In file included from
>> /home/florian/software/petsc/include/petscksp.h:6:0,
>> from prbf.cpp:9:
>> /home/florian/software/petsc/include/petscpc.h:9:14: error:
>> 'PetscErrorCode' does not name a type
>> PETSC_EXTERN PetscErrorCode PCInitializePackage(void);
>
> What do you expect when you put some things in the namespace and
> include
> dependencies outside the namespace?
Well, I have these symbols in the petsc and in the global namespace.
> namespaces don't play well with macros (including header guards). I
> don't think what you are attempting is a good use of time, but if you
> do
> it, I would recommend creating a public interface that does not include
> any PETSc headers, thus completely hiding the PETSc interface.
I want to offer an interface that uses some Petsc types (like Vec and
Mat) but I do not want to import all petsc symbols into the global
namespace for anyone using the interface. That does not seam possible
though...
Thanks,
Florian
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list