[petsc-users] PCFieldSplitSetSchurPre in fortran
Matthew Knepley
knepley at gmail.com
Wed Sep 3 09:38:26 CDT 2014
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Klaij, Christiaan <C.Klaij at marin.nl> wrote:
> Matt,
>
> Thanks, after applying the fix to my petsc-3.5.1 install, the
> small Fortran program works as expected.
>
> Now, I would like to change the fortran strategy to the
> option "3) Using Fortran modules". So, in the small fortran
> program I replace these seven lines
>
> #include <finclude/petscsys.h>
> #include <finclude/petscis.h>
> #include <finclude/petscvec.h>
> #include <finclude/petscmat.h>
> #include <finclude/petscpc.h>
> #include <finclude/petscksp.h>
> #include <finclude/petscviewer.h>
>
> by the two following lines
>
> use petscksp
> #include <finclude/petsckspdef.>
>
> This still compiles but I get the two old problem back...
>
I have no idea why. Can you look at the values of those enumerations?
Matt
> Chris
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 03, 2014 2:12 PM
> *To:* Klaij, Christiaan
> *Cc:* petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov
> *Subject:* Re: [petsc-users] PCFieldSplitSetSchurPre in fortran
>
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Klaij, Christiaan <C.Klaij at marin.nl>
> wrote:
>
>> Matt,
>>
>> Thanks for the fix. If I understand correctly, in an existing
>> install of petsc-3.5.1, I would only need to replace the
>> file "finclude/petscpc.h" by the new file for the fix to
>> work? (instead of downloading dev, configuring, installing on
>> various machines).
>>
>
> Yes
>
> Matt
>
>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>
>> MARIN news: Bas Buchner speaker at Lowpex conference at SMM Hamburg
>> <http://www.marin.nl/web/News/News-items/Bas-Buchner-speaker-at-Lowpex-conference-at-SMM-Hamburg.htm>
>>
>> This e-mail may be confidential, privileged and/or protected by
>> copyright. If you are not the intended recipient, you should return it to
>> the sender immediately and delete your copy from your system.
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 02, 2014 5:42 PM
>> *To:* Klaij, Christiaan
>> *Cc:* petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov
>> *Subject:* Re: [petsc-users] PCFieldSplitSetSchurPre in fortran
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 2:08 AM, Klaij, Christiaan <C.Klaij at marin.nl>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Matt,
>>>
>>> Attached is a small Fortran code that replicates the second problem.
>>>
>>
>> This was a Fortran define problem. I fixed it on next
>>
>>
>> https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/branch/knepley/fix-pc-fieldsplit-fortran
>>
>> and it will be in maint and master tomorrow.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> dr. ir. Christiaan Klaij
>>>
>>> CFD Researcher
>>> Research & Development
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *MARIN*
>>>
>>>
>>> 2, Haagsteeg E C.Klaij at marin.nl P.O. Box 28 T +31 317 49 39 11 6700
>>> AA Wageningen F +31 317 49 32 45 T +31 317 49 33 44 The Netherlands I
>>> www.marin.nl
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> MARIN news: MARIN at SMM, Hamburg, September 9-12
>>> <http://www.marin.nl/web/News/News-items/MARIN-at-SMM-Hamburg-September-912.htm>
>>>
>>> This e-mail may be confidential, privileged and/or protected by
>>> copyright. If you are not the intended recipient, you should return it to
>>> the sender immediately and delete your copy from your system.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From:* Klaij, Christiaan
>>> *Sent:* Friday, August 29, 2014 4:42 PM
>>> *To:* Matthew Knepley
>>> *Cc:* petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov
>>> *Subject:* RE: [petsc-users] PCFieldSplitSetSchurPre in fortran
>>>
>>> Matt,
>>>
>>> The small test code (ex70) is in C and it works fine, the problem
>>> happens in a big Fortran code. I will try to replicate the
>>> problem in a small Fortran code, but that will take some time.
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From:* Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>
>>> *Sent:* Friday, August 29, 2014 4:14 PM
>>> *To:* Klaij, Christiaan
>>> *Cc:* petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov
>>> *Subject:* Re: [petsc-users] PCFieldSplitSetSchurPre in fortran
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Klaij, Christiaan <C.Klaij at marin.nl>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm trying PCFieldSplitSetSchurPre with
>>>> PC_FIELDSPLIT_SCHUR_PRE_SELFP in petsc-3.5.1 using fortran.
>>>>
>>>> The first problem is that PC_FIELDSPLIT_SCHUR_PRE_SELFP seems to
>>>> be missing in fortran, I get the compile error:
>>>>
>>>> This name does not have a type, and must have an explicit type.
>>>> [PC_FIELDSPLIT_SCHUR_PRE_SELFP]
>>>>
>>>> while compilation works fine with _A11, _SELF and _USER.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Mark Adams has just fixed this.
>>>
>>>
>>>> The second problem is that the call doesn't seem to have any
>>>> effect. For example, I have
>>>>
>>>> CALL PCFieldSplitSetSchurPre(pc,PC_FIELDSPLIT_SCHUR_PRE_USER,aa,ierr)
>>>> CALL
>>>> PCFieldSplitSetSchurFactType(pc,PC_FIELDSPLIT_SCHUR_FACT_LOWER,ierr)
>>>>
>>>> This compiles and runs, but ksp_view tells me
>>>>
>>>> PC Object:(sys_) 3 MPI processes
>>>> type: fieldsplit
>>>> FieldSplit with Schur preconditioner, factorization LOWER
>>>> Preconditioner for the Schur complement formed from A11
>>>>
>>>> So changing the factorization from the default FULL to LOWER did
>>>> work, but changing the preconditioner from A11 to USER didn't.
>>>>
>>>> I've also tried to run directly from the command line using
>>>>
>>>> -sys_pc_fieldsplit_schur_precondition user -sys_ksp_view
>>>>
>>>> This works in the sense that I don't get the "WARNING! There are
>>>> options you set that were not used!" message, but still ksp_view
>>>> reports A11 instead of user provided matrix.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Can you send a small test code, since I use this everyday here and it
>>> works.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>>
>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> dr. ir. Christiaan Klaij
>>>> CFD Researcher
>>>> Research & Development
>>>> E mailto:C.Klaij at marin.nl
>>>> T +31 317 49 33 44
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> MARIN
>>>> 2, Haagsteeg, P.O. Box 28, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
>>>> T +31 317 49 39 11, F +31 317 49 32 45, I www.marin.nl
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
>>> experiments lead.
>>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
>> experiments lead.
>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>
--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20140903/058e5a05/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: imageae8e3c.JPG
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1622 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20140903/058e5a05/attachment-0002.jpe>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image76463f.JPG
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1069 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20140903/058e5a05/attachment-0003.jpe>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list