[petsc-users] Drastic increase in memory usage between DMDA_STENCIL_BOX and DMDA_STENCIL_STAR
Barry Smith
bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
Tue Mar 18 21:14:18 CDT 2014
On Mar 18, 2014, at 8:04 PM, Mani Chandra <mc0710 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see a 4x increase in the memory usage when I change from DMDA_STENCIL_STAR to DMDA_STENCIL_BOX. Attached are the outputs of -log_summary which shows a huge increase in the matrix memory usage. Is this expected?
>
> On a different note, suppose I am running a serial calculation with no need to exchange data but I am using corner node information,
How can you use corner node information if you are not exchanging it? You will be using incorrect data
> do I need to use DMDA_STENCIL_BOX? Would the jacobian when computed using colored finite differences be correctly represented if I use corner information but still use DMDA_STENCIL_STAR?
>
> Thanks,
> Mani
>
>
> <dmda_stencil_box.txt><dmda_stencil_star.txt>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list