[petsc-users] help with vecSetValuesSectionF90
Dharmendar Reddy
dharmareddy84 at gmail.com
Sat Jan 11 02:13:00 CST 2014
Okay. Thanks.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Dharmendar Reddy <dharmareddy84 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> I am getting an error using VecSetValuesSectionF90. I had this
>> working before, i do not know whats wrong now. The call is deep inside
>> my code so i am not able to create a test case.
>
>
> I believe this is our bug, from the name change. If you look in
>
> include/finclude/ftn-custom/petscvec.h90:43
>
> you see that the function name is wrong. This causes the Fortran compiler to
> emit wrong code and
> never tell us about it. If you change the name here and recompile it should
> work. I will push this fix
> tomorrow.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
>>
>> I am using: Petsc Development GIT revision:
>> b45093d79c132b908a729253318f899155602205 GIT Date: 2013-11-11 1
>> 6:19:16 -0600
>> Hope the code chunk below, can help identify the issue.
>>
>> The following is the sequence of calls:
>>
>> DM :: dm
>> Vec :: localX
>> InsertMode :: mode
>> PetscErrorCode :: ierr
>> !
>> PetscSection :: section ! defualt section
>> PetscScalar,allocatable :: values(:) ! size numDofPerPoint
>> integer :: vertexId
>> integer :: vertexIdStart, vertexIdEnd
>> integer :: vertextdim
>> integer :: numConstrainedDOF
>> integer :: rgnId,bcId,offset
>> integer :: IdStart,IdEnd
>> integer :: fc
>> vertextdim = 0
>> call DMPlexGetDepthStratum(dm,vertextdim,vertexIdStart,vertexIdEnd,
>> ierr)
>> call DMGetDefaultSection(dm, section, ierr)
>> call PetscSectionView(section,PETSC_VIEWER_STDOUT_SELF,ierr)
>> allocate(values(this%dofMap%numFieldComp))
>> print*, 'size of values is',this%dofMap%numFieldComp
>> do vertexId=vertexIdStart,vertexIdEnd-1
>> call
>> PetscSectionGetConstraintDof(section,vertexId,numConstrainedDOF,ierr)
>> print*,'vertex dof',vertexId,numConstrainedDOF
>> if(numConstrainedDOF > 0) then
>> call DMPlexGetLabelValue(dm,'Boundary',vertexId,rgnId, ierr)
>> values = 0.0_WP
>> offset = 0
>> do fc = 1,this%numField
>> ! check if Field at vertextId is contained
>> IdStart = offset + 1
>> IdEnd = offset + this%numComp(fc)
>> !if(fieldIdisconstrained) then
>> bcId = this%getBCId(fc,rgnId)
>> values(IdStart:IdEnd) = this%BC(bcId)%getBC()
>> !end if
>> offset = offset + this%numComp(fc)
>> end do
>> print*,'Setting bc value',values(1),'at vertex',vertexId,rgnId
>> call VecSetValuesSectionF90(localX, section, vertexId,
>> values,Mode,ierr)
>> end if
>> end do
>> deallocate(values)
>>
>> The three print statements above print the following lines.
>>
>> size of values is 1
>> vertex dof 600 1
>> Setting bc value -35.7688912272406 at vertex 600
>> 1
>>
>> So, i am passing the correct size array to VecSetValuesSectionF90.
>> However, when i run the code through intel debugger, i get the
>> following:
>>
>> size of values is 1
>> vertex dof 600 1
>> Setting bc value -35.7688912272406 at vertex 600
>> 1
>> Program received signal SIGSEGV
>> VecSetValuesSection (v=0x2bf5620, s=0x2b41a60, point=600,
>> values=0x447e3d3b071996fc, mode=INSERT_BC_VALUES
>> ) at
>> /home1/00924/Reddy135/LocalApps/petsc/src/vec/vec/utils/vsection.c:185
>> 185 if (doBC) array[i] = values[i]; /* Constrained update
>> */
>> (idb) print values[0]
>> $1 = <no value>
>>
>>
>> The value i passed from Fortran code is not missing.
>>
>> The relevant call trace is:
>>
>> (idb) bt
>> #0 0x00002b477a299b2d in VecSetValuesSection (v=0x2bf5620,
>> s=0x2b41a60, point=600, values=0x447e3d3b071996fc, mode
>> =INSERT_BC_VALUES) at
>> /home1/00924/Reddy135/LocalApps/petsc/src/vec/vec/utils/vsection.c:185
>> #1 0x00002b477a29aead in vecsetvaluessectionf90_ (v=0x7fff16adce30,
>> section=0x7fff16adc790, point=0x7fff16adc6f4,
>> ptr=0x2b12740, mode=0x9aa990, __ierr=0x7fff16adce08) at
>> /home1/00924/Reddy135/LocalApps/petsc/src/vec/vec/utils/f90
>> -custom/zvsectionf90.c:17
>>
>>
>> Am i doing some thing wrong ?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Reddy
>>
>> --
>> -----------------------------------------------------
>> Dharmendar Reddy Palle
>> Graduate Student
>> Microelectronics Research center,
>> University of Texas at Austin,
>> 10100 Burnet Road, Bldg. 160
>> MER 2.608F, TX 78758-4445
>> e-mail: dharmareddy84 at gmail.com
>> Phone: +1-512-350-9082
>> United States of America.
>> Homepage: https://webspace.utexas.edu/~dpr342
>
>
>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments
> is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments
> lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Dharmendar Reddy Palle
Graduate Student
Microelectronics Research center,
University of Texas at Austin,
10100 Burnet Road, Bldg. 160
MER 2.608F, TX 78758-4445
e-mail: dharmareddy84 at gmail.com
Phone: +1-512-350-9082
United States of America.
Homepage: https://webspace.utexas.edu/~dpr342
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list