[petsc-users] flag -citations to PETSc

[Åsmund Ervik]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ok, so PETSC_DEFAULT_REAL works fine with master but not with 3.4.
What are my options if I want to keep this simple? I can pretty much
guarantee that my colleagues and the test server won't all switch to
3.5 simultaneously. Is there a better fix than hardcoding in the
default values? KSPSetTolerances is the only place where we use these.

Regards
Åsmund


On 06. feb. 2014 13:46, Barry Smith wrote:
> 
> Sorry, we changed these to match the “PETSc type” so it is now
> PETSC_DEFAULT_REAL; the reasoning is that this works when you build
> PetscReal as single precision, double, or quad while the name
> PETSC_DEFAULT_DOUBLE_PRECISION is tied to double only which was
> never the intention.
> 
> Barry
> 
> On Feb 6, 2014, at 6:31 AM, Åsmund Ervik <asmund.ervik at ntnu.no>
> wrote:
> 
> Thanks guys. I tried master and it works as expected.
> 
> However, I had to make a small change to my code when using 
> petsc-master. Previously I had
> 
> call KSPSetTolerances(ksp,resid,PETSC_DEFAULT_DOUBLE_PRECISION, 
> PETSC_DEFAULT_DOUBLE_PRECISION,maxiter,ierr)
> 
> but with petsc-master I got Error: Symbol
> 'petsc_default_double_precision' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type when
> compiling. For now I just hard-coded in the old defaults 10^-50 and
> 10^5. Is this due to an upcoming change in 3.5?
> 
> Regards, Åsmund
> 
> 
> On 05. feb. 2014 15:35, Karl Rupp wrote:
>>>> Hi Åsmund,
>>>> 
>>>> this is not yet in the release, you need to use PETSc master
>>>> or PETSc next for the citation flag to work.
>>>> 
>>>> Best regards, Karli
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 02/05/2014 03:33 PM, Åsmund Ervik wrote: Good people of
>>>> PETSc,
>>>> 
>>>> I see on the internet 
>>>> (http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/documentation/referencing.html)
>>>> that one may use the flag "-citations file.bib" to a program
>>>> using PETSc to get some useful references e.g. for citing in
>>>> an article. However, this does nothing when I try it, and I
>>>> can't find any mention of this in the manual. Has this flag
>>>> been removed?
>>>> 
>>>> Best regards, Åsmund
>>>>> 
>>>> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS85VzAAoJED+FDAHgGz19FRcIAM9JgrQH3YYlDktH09lDhBfZ
jNfecbgAVX7H3HLJaWd2J6Nmuj19MLVSzu//vKut0pYuskZG8bK4ub5qmkzvz3sl
/vG1FG/L+c1gREDMQlyTEKbyLXd45EVz0FRXMlkj1bION35Sw0eyXJ/AW/JTaIrv
CpQcgN8g4SXlkX57T3tPOyVoE0JFnRnOZovrVctzA/owX90uwzYvN3H2U401gSzS
Mw+B9vvziw0nGXDNtTPYjEtCeBBnvihroxWZZFQ7bqJEG0joO5vuK3on9o7pX6bB
DzFCGGSdnZDNksP43evqzdyxemN1bB64WfP2F95WvxWPLdW3SDOkfHfOZrWTduc=
=OGIK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----