[petsc-users] MatMPIBAIJSetPreallocationCSR i and j indices
Jed Brown
jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov
Sun Sep 29 21:31:25 CDT 2013
Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> writes:
> Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> writes:
>
>> I am fine with this. In fact I would go ahead and make the change
>> in the branch I already made exactly for this work. Sadly, git
>> allowed me to fuck up the branch so I cannot easily work on that
>> branch since it empty, if only git could have warned me I was
>> fucking up…..
>
> You can still create a new branch and we can merge later so that it
> looks like your current commit had been in the branch all along,
> provided we merge it to 'maint' before merging something else there.
On second thought, I think this should be reverted in 'maint' because it
would break existing code that calls the *SetPreallocationCSR functions.
Interface "improvements" belong in 'master' where they can be documented
in release notes and people know that some things might change.
I'm preparing a branch that respects MAT_ROW_ORIENTED and keeps
MatSeqBAIJSetPreallocationCSR consistent.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20130929/fe9cc008/attachment.pgp>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list