[petsc-users] Trying to set up a field-split preconditioner
subramanya sadasiva
potaman at outlook.com
Fri Jul 19 21:17:18 CDT 2013
Hi Matt, I am using Libmesh so the DM stuff is actually in the background, and unfortunately the matrix doesn't have a saddle point, I thought that
-ch_solve_fieldsplit_block_size 2 -ch_solve_fieldsplit_0_fields 0 -ch_solve_fieldsplit_1_fields 1
would inform the solver of the structure. If this doesn't work owing to the fact that the problem is only being solved on a section of the mesh (because of the reduced space method), I guess I will have to use the PetscSection. Does that sound right?
Thanks, Subramanya
Subject: Re: [petsc-users] Trying to set up a field-split preconditioner
From: knepley at gmail.com
To: potaman at outlook.com
CC: petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov; libmesh-users at lists.sourceforge.net
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 7:56 PM, subramanya sadasiva <potaman at outlook.com> wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to set up a fieldsplit preconditioner for my Cahn Hilliard solver and I get the following error,
You have to tell the PCFIELDSPLIT about the dofs in each field. So
1) You are probably not using a DA, since it would tell it automatically
2) If you have a saddle point, you can use -pc_fieldsplit_detect_saddle_point
3) If none of those apply, you can set a PetscSection describing your layout to the DM for the solver.
Since this is new, I suspect you will need help, so mail back.
Thanks,
Matt
[0]PETSC ERROR: --------------------- Error Message ------------------------------------
[0]PETSC ERROR: Petsc has generated inconsistent data![0]PETSC ERROR: Unhandled case, must have at least two fields, not 0![0]PETSC ERROR: ------------------------------------------------------------------------
These are the options that I am using, -ch_solve is just a prefix.
-ch_solve_pc_type fieldsplit
-ch_solve_pc_fieldsplit_type schur-ch_solve_fieldsplit_block_size 2-ch_solve_fieldsplit_0_field 1-ch_solve_fieldsplit_1_field 0-ch_solve_fieldsplit_0_ksp_type cg
-ch_solve_fieldsplit_0_pc_type hypre-ch_solve_fieldsplit_0_pc_type_hypre boomeramg -ch_solve_fieldsplit_1_ksp_type cg-ch_solve_fieldsplit_1_pc_type hypre -ch_solve_fieldsplit_1_pc_type_hypre boomeramg
Any ideas?
Thanks,Subramanya
--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20130719/eb8b383f/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list