[petsc-users] automatic determination of which libraries petsc wants

Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com
Thu Jan 31 18:38:27 CST 2013


On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Geoffrey Irving <irving at naml.us> wrote:
>
>> We have an scons build system linking against PETSc, and it would be
>> nice to have an automatic way of determining the list of libraries
>> that a statically linked, installed version of PETSc wants (e.g., the
>> MacPorts installed version).  What's a good way to do such a thing
>> from *outside* the PETSc build system?
>>
>
> It depends on how much work you want to do. For at least two years I think,
> our default had been -lpetsc. I would just do this.
>

Satish is right, use 'make getlinklibs'.

However, if you don't have to waste time on a life or family, you may want
to consider
getting the info straight from the configure. You can load up the Python
module from
from $PETSC_ARCH/conf/RDict.db and pull out all these things. There is an
example
in configVars.py.

   Matt


>    Matt
>
>
>> Thanks,
>> Geoffrey
>>
>
>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>



-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20130131/b3e08ffa/attachment.html>


More information about the petsc-users mailing list