[petsc-users] -pc_factor_mat_solver_package wish_list

[Jed Brown]

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

>    Ok, so you are suggesting the same functions/options database as today
> except that : separated strings for alternatives?
>

Yes


>
>     Note that PetscFListGetPathAndFunction() which is used by all the
> checkers handles the form [/path/libname[.so.1.0]:]functionname[()] so : is
> already reserved. I would suggest | but the damn shell would require always
> protecting the arguments with "".
>

Maybe comma since semicolon is also taken. Pipe isn't that bad because
usually people would be using this notation from an options file.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20130107/ac381a5c/attachment.html>