[petsc-users] -pc_factor_mat_solver_package wish_list

[Jed Brown]

It would be very easy to make PetscFListFind interpret
choice1:choice2:choice3 as searching for items in that order, in which case
this sort of option would work anywhere. This sounds convenient to me,
though if you have impl-specific suboptions, you'll be notified that those
were not used in -options_left. Is this okay?


On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Eric Chamberland <
Eric.Chamberland at giref.ulaval.ca> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have just compiled Petsc with "--with-64-bit-indices" and I see that
> MUMPS is missing but superLu still there.  Ok like that.
>
> Now I would like to have something like this on my command line:
>
> -pc_factor_mat_solver_package mumps_if_available_otherwise_**superlu_dist
>
> How can I add or register something in petsc to have this behavior?
>
> Thank you!
>
> Eric
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20130107/f9a5b8c2/attachment.html>