[petsc-users] A quick question on 'un-symmetric graph'

Jed Brown jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov
Sat Jan 5 23:02:21 CST 2013


On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Mark F. Adams <mark.adams at columbia.edu>wrote:

> Isolated nodes are removed (so I do not actually do a true MIS) but if the
> graph not symmetric then other other processors think they are talking to a
> BC node and expect it to talk back to them.  Maybe we are not understanding
> each other.


I meant to mark boundary nodes (by looking at rows) and communicate that
status so that other rows don't expect it to "talk back".
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20130105/4dc51e66/attachment.html>


More information about the petsc-users mailing list