[petsc-users] -no_signal_handler flag
Wadud.Miah at awe.co.uk
Wadud.Miah at awe.co.uk
Thu Aug 15 04:31:35 CDT 2013
Hello,
Would it be possible to build PETSc so that the flag -no_signal_handler does not have to specified at run time? Or is there a PETSc subroutine that can be called to implement the -no_signal_handler feature?
Many thanks,
--------------------------
Wadud Miah
HPC, Design and Theoretical Physics
Direct: 0118 98 56220
AWE, Aldermaston, Reading, RG7 4PR
___________________________________________________
____________________________
The information in this email and in any attachment(s) is
commercial in confidence. If you are not the named addressee(s)
or
if you receive this email in error then any distribution, copying or
use of this communication or the information in it is strictly
prohibited. Please notify us immediately by email at
admin.internet(at)awe.co.uk, and then delete this message from
your computer. While attachments are virus checked, AWE plc
does not accept any liability in respect of any virus which is not
detected.
AWE Plc
Registered in England and Wales
Registration No 02763902
AWE, Aldermaston, Reading, RG7 4PR
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20130815/b88a0965/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list