[petsc-users] Fwd: Re: Problem with fortran version of ex29 in ksp
TAY wee-beng
zonexo at gmail.com
Fri May 4 10:05:58 CDT 2012
On 4/5/2012 3:05 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:59 AM, TAY wee-beng <zonexo at gmail.com
> <mailto:zonexo at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there anything else I can try to get it working right?
>
>
> The MatGetNullSpaceRemove() is missing.
Where should I add MatGetNullSpaceRemove and what are its syntax? I
googled but there's no results.
Thanks.
>
> Matt
>
> Thanks！
>
>
> On 2/5/2012 10:11 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:55 PM, TAY wee-beng <zonexo at gmail.com
>> <mailto:zonexo at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I did a MatView and VecView on both C and Fortran, right
>> after Mat and Vec assembly. I have attached the printout
>> below. They are exactly the same, but yet the result is
>> different in Neumann condition. However, the dirichlet
>> condition gives the correct ans. Is there anything else that
>> could be wrong even if the Mat and Vec are the same?
>>
>>
>> Did you set the null space for the matrix when you have Neumann
>> conditions?
> Yes, for the matrix, I set as:
>
> call
> MatNullSpaceCreate(PETSC_COMM_WORLD,PETSC_TRUE,0,PETSC_NULL_OBJECT,nullspace,ierr)
>
> call MatSetNullSpace(jac,nullspace,ierr)
>
> call MatNullSpaceDestroy(nullspace,ierr)
>
> for the Vec,
>
> call
> MatNullSpaceCreate(PETSC_COMM_WORLD,PETSC_TRUE,0,PETSC_NULL_OBJECT,nullspace,ierr)
>
> *!call MatNullSpaceRemove(nullspace,b,PETSC_NULL,ierr)*
>
> call MatNullSpaceDestroy(nullspace,ierr)
>
> MatNullSpaceRemove was comment out because there's error during
> linking
>
>
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Fortran:
>>
>> Matrix Object: 1 MPI processes
>> type: seqaij
>> row 0: (0, 2) (1, -1) (3, -1)
>> row 1: (0, -1) (1, 3) (2, -1) (4, -1)
>> row 2: (1, -1) (2, 2) (5, -1)
>> row 3: (0, -1) (3, 3) (4, -1) (6, -1)
>> row 4: (1, -1) (3, -1) (4, 4) (5, -1) (7, -1)
>> row 5: (2, -1) (4, -1) (5, 3) (8, -1)
>> row 6: (3, -1) (6, 2) (7, -1)
>> row 7: (4, -1) (6, -1) (7, 3) (8, -1)
>> row 8: (5, -1) (7, -1) (8, 2)
>> Vector Object:Vec_0000000084000000_0 1 MPI processes
>> type: mpi
>> Process [0]
>> 0.25
>> 0.0205213
>> 1.135e-005
>> 0.0205213
>> 0.00168449
>> 9.31663e-007
>> 1.135e-005
>> 9.31663e-007
>> 5.15289e-010
>> Vector Object:Vec_0000000084000000_1 1 MPI processes
>> type: mpi
>> Process [0]
>> 0.14924
>> 0.0242397
>> -0.0260347
>> 0.0242397
>> -0.0256192
>> -0.0400102
>> -0.0260347
>> -0.0400102
>> -0.0400102
>> Press any key to continue . . .
>>
>> C:
>>
>> Matrix Object: 1 MPI processes
>> type: seqaij
>> row 0: (0, 2) (1, -1) (3, -1)
>> row 1: (0, -1) (1, 3) (2, -1) (4, -1)
>> row 2: (1, -1) (2, 2) (5, -1)
>> row 3: (0, -1) (3, 3) (4, -1) (6, -1)
>> row 4: (1, -1) (3, -1) (4, 4) (5, -1) (7, -1)
>> row 5: (2, -1) (4, -1) (5, 3) (8, -1)
>> row 6: (3, -1) (6, 2) (7, -1)
>> row 7: (4, -1) (6, -1) (7, 3) (8, -1)
>> row 8: (5, -1) (7, -1) (8, 2)
>> Vector Object:Vec_0x1d3b000_0 1 MPI processes
>> type: mpi
>> Process [0]
>> 0.25
>> 0.0205212
>> 1.135e-05
>> 0.0205212
>> 0.00168449
>> 9.31663e-07
>> 1.135e-05
>> 9.31663e-07
>> 5.15288e-10
>> Vector Object:Vec_0x1d3b000_1 1 MPI processes
>> type: mpi
>> Process [0]
>> 0.139311
>> 0.0305751
>> -0.0220633
>> 0.0305751
>> -0.0135158
>> -0.042185
>> -0.0220633
>> -0.042185
>> -0.058449
>>
>>
>>
>> Yours sincerely,
>>
>> TAY wee-beng
>>
>>
>> On 1/5/2012 11:54 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:48 PM, TAY wee-beng
>>> <zonexo at gmail.com <mailto:zonexo at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Do you mean my method is wrong?
>>>
>>> I am following the template of ex22f,
>>>
>>> where the variables are declared as :
>>>
>>> PetscScalar v(5)
>>>
>>> MatStencil row(4),col(4,5)
>>>
>>> Hence,
>>>
>>> for the neumann BC
>>>
>>> num = 1
>>>
>>> if (j/=0) then
>>>
>>> v(num) = -rho*HxdHy
>>>
>>> col(MatStencil_i,num) = i
>>>
>>> col(MatStencil_j,num) = j-1
>>>
>>> num = num + 1
>>>
>>> end if
>>>
>>> if (i/=0) then
>>>
>>> v(num) = -rho*HydHx
>>>
>>> col(MatStencil_i,num) = i-1
>>>
>>> col(MatStencil_j,num) = j
>>>
>>> num = num + 1
>>>
>>> end if
>>>
>>> if (i/=mx-1) then
>>>
>>> v(num) = -rho*HydHx
>>>
>>> col(MatStencil_i,num) = i+1
>>>
>>> col(MatStencil_j,num) = j
>>>
>>> num = num + 1
>>>
>>> end if
>>>
>>> if (j/=my-1) then
>>>
>>> v(num) = -rho*HxdHy
>>>
>>> col(MatStencil_i,num) = i
>>>
>>> col(MatStencil_j,num) = j+1
>>>
>>> num = num + 1
>>>
>>> end if
>>>
>>> v(num) = ((num-1)/2.0)*rho*(HxdHy + HydHx)
>>>
>>> print *, v
>>>
>>> col(MatStencil_i,num) = i
>>>
>>> col(MatStencil_j,num) = j
>>>
>>> !num = num + 1
>>>
>>> call
>>> MatSetValuesStencil(jac,i1,row,num,col,v,INSERT_VALUES,ierr)
>>>
>>> I do not get any more out of range error. However,my ans
>>> is still different from that of ex29 in C.
>>>
>>>
>>> This is very simple. You have an error in your code.
>>> Checking it is very simple: run the code and
>>> break in MatSetValues(). Make sure ex29 makes calls with
>>> exactly the same indices as your ex29f.
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>> Yours sincerely,
>>>
>>> TAY wee-beng
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin
>>> their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any
>>> results to which their experiments lead.
>>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to
>> which their experiments lead.
>> -- Norbert Wiener
>
>
>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
> their experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20120504/ed0eb2a7/attachment.htm>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list