[petsc-users] KSP no longer returning NaNs?
Matthew Knepley
knepley at gmail.com
Wed Jul 25 16:42:39 CDT 2012
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) <
benjamin.kirk-1 at nasa.gov> wrote:
> Hello -
>
> I've been using PETSc 3.1 for quite a while now and have been hesitant to
> upgrade because of some new behavior I found in 3.2. Let me explain...
>
> In petsc-3.1, if the KSP encountered a NaN it would return it to the
> application code. We actually liked this feature because it gives us an
> opportunity to catch the NaN and attempt recovery, in our case by
> decreasing
> the time step and trying again.
>
> It seems in petsc-3.2, however, that PETSc itself aborts internally, so we
> are unable to recover from the situation.
>
> Is there any way to get the old behavior back?
>
1) How exactly could the KSP generate a NaN if it was not injected in A or
b?
2) You can always check the return value of KSPSolve() and do what you did
last time.
Matt
> Thanks,
>
> -Ben
>
>
--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20120725/ebc277fa/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list