[petsc-users] performance surprise

Jed Brown jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov
Sat Jan 21 10:53:57 CST 2012


On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 10:50, Dominik Szczerba <dominik at itis.ethz.ch>wrote:

> Jed, Barry: thanks for the responses. I was aware of the related FAQ
> entry but somehow thought only standard desktop SMPs were concerned. I
> never suspected interconnect communication to be better than internal
> memory bus...
>

You are conflating memory bandwidth with network bandwidth. You need memory
bandwidth if you have a working set larger than cache, but each socket only
has enough memory bandwidth for one or two cores, so adding more cores
doesn't speed up your program. Network performance is a separate issue.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20120121/1e7efefa/attachment.htm>


More information about the petsc-users mailing list