[petsc-users] Field split questions
Colin McAuliffe
cjm2176 at columbia.edu
Wed Aug 8 20:52:57 CDT 2012
Is there an alternative to this routine that will allow me to define
hierarchical field splits in 3.1p8? It will be a fairly significant
undertaking to upgrade the fortran code I am using to be compatible
with newer versions of petsc.
Colin
Quoting Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov>:
>
> Colin,
>
> I'm sorry we never had a FORTRAN interface for this routine.
> You'll need to switch to petsc-dev
> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/developers/index.html to use that
> function.
>
> Barry
>
>
> On Aug 8, 2012, at 7:54 PM, Colin McAuliffe <cjm2176 at columbia.edu> wrote:
>
>> Thanks I will look into DM. Is PCFieldSplitGetSubKSP in petsc
>> version 3.1p8 callable from fortran? I am getting the following
>> error when I compile the fortran code, and I cant figure out if
>> this is an error in my code or what.
>>
>> Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
>> "_pcfieldsplitgetsubksp_", referenced from:
>> _umacr6_ in umacr6.o
>> ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
>>
>>
>> thanks
>> Colin
>>
>>
>> Quoting Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Colin McAuliffe
>>> <cjm2176 at columbia.edu>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello all,
>>>>
>>>> When using PCFieldSplitSetIS to define splits within splits, should the IS
>>>> contain indices in the original matrix or in the next highest split level?
>>>>
>>>
>>> The next highest split level. You might consider using a DM if you have
>>> some structure (like discretization on a mesh).
>>> This should handle all the index-wrangling for you. It is new, but intended
>>> for just this kind of thing.
>>>
>>> Also, my matrix is in aij format but one of the sub fields has a block
>>>> diagonal structure. Is it still possible use block jacobi on this field?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks and all the best
>>>> Colin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Colin McAuliffe
>>>> PhD Candidate
>>>> Columbia University
>>>> Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
>>> experiments lead.
>>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Colin McAuliffe
>> PhD Candidate
>> Columbia University
>> Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics
>
>
>
--
Colin McAuliffe
PhD Candidate
Columbia University
Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list