[petsc-users] ASM for High-Order FEM
Barry Smith
bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
Mon Mar 14 15:47:13 CDT 2011
I am adding to the manual page the fact that both is and is_local are in global numbering.
barry
On Mar 14, 2011, at 3:42 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Travis Austin <austin at txcorp.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your responses. I saw a previous thread on this from Matt.
>
> If you want multiple blocks/process AND you want to be able to do RASM, then
> you need to specify both
>
> 1) the overlapping blocks
>
> 2) the non-overlapping parts
>
> You need 2), because I have no idea how to calculate 2) given only 1). We
> could have an alternative interface that
> took 2) and an overlap, and figured it out, however currently that only
> works for 1 block/process, and specfiying
> both 1) and 2) is more general (I needed it for a specific PC).
>
> The overlapping blocks are global indices and the non-overlapping are local indices? Is that right?
>
> No, both are global.
>
> Matt
>
> Thanks,
> Travis
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Travis Austin, Ph.D.
> Tech-X Corporation
> 5621 Arapahoe Ave, Suite A
> Boulder, CO 80303
> austin at txcorp.com
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list