[petsc-users] ASM for High-Order FEM

Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
Mon Mar 14 15:47:13 CDT 2011


  I am adding to the manual page the fact that both is and is_local are in global numbering.

   barry

On Mar 14, 2011, at 3:42 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Travis Austin <austin at txcorp.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for your responses.  I saw a previous thread on this from Matt.  
> 
>    If you want multiple blocks/process AND you want to be able to do RASM, then
>    you need to specify both
> 
>     1) the overlapping blocks
> 
>     2) the non-overlapping parts
> 
>    You need 2), because I have no idea how to calculate 2) given only 1). We  
>    could have an alternative interface that
>    took 2) and an overlap, and figured it out, however currently that only 
>    works for 1 block/process, and specfiying
>    both 1) and 2) is more general (I needed it for a specific PC).
> 
> The overlapping blocks are global indices and the non-overlapping are local indices?  Is that right?
> 
> No, both are global.
> 
>   Matt
>  
> Thanks,
> Travis
> 
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Travis Austin, Ph.D.
> Tech-X Corporation
> 5621 Arapahoe Ave, Suite A
> Boulder, CO 80303
> austin at txcorp.com
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener



More information about the petsc-users mailing list