space allocation for a parallel matrix
Yixun Liu
enjoywm at cs.wm.edu
Tue Feb 3 09:56:34 CST 2009
Matthew Knepley wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Yixun Liu <enjoywm at cs.wm.edu> wrote:
>
>> Matthew Knepley wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Yixun Liu <enjoywm at cs.wm.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I am confusing to the allocation for a parallel matrix in PETSC manual,
>>>>
>>>> "If PETSC DECIDE is not used for the arguments m and n, then the user
>>>> must ensure that they are chosen
>>>> to be compatible with the vectors. To do this, one first considers the
>>>> matrix-vector product y = Ax. The m
>>>> that is used in the matrix creation routine MatCreateMPIAIJ() must match
>>>> the local size used in the vector
>>>> creation routine VecCreateMPI() for y. Likewise, the n used must match
>>>> that used as the local size in
>>>> VecCreateMPI() for x."
>>>>
>>>> Since the process holds all the columns, why does it only hold part of
>>>> vector x? Is it convenient for the matrix vector multiplication?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I am not sure I understand your question. However, Mat objects do hold
>>> all columns of a row. The local column size 'n' is used to match against
>>> a Vec, not for storage.
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Yixun
>>>>
>>>>
>> What I mean is that the process holds all the column, but only part of
>> the vector, how to do the multiplication? It needs communicate with
>> other processes. Right?
>>
>
> Yes. This is explained fairly well in Yousef Saad's book "Iterative Methods
> for Sparse Linear Systems".
>
> Matt
>
>
It means that it is better to set n to be equal to the column to avoid
the communication. Right? If it does, I am confusing why we need this
parameter. Just for dealing with very large vector x?
Thanks.!
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list