[petsc-users] removing small entries from a sparse matrix
Dominik Szczerba
dominik at itis.ethz.ch
Wed Dec 30 02:35:20 CST 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Have there been any studies in that matter? Anything I should cite to
justify such choice?
Dominik
Barry Smith wrote:
> Keep the small values. The nonzero structure will also help the
> convergence of most preconditioners.
>
> Barry
>
> On Dec 29, 2009, at 4:38 PM, Dominik Szczerba wrote:
>
> Is it possible to remove small (subject to given tol) entries in my
> sparse coefficient matrix after the values have been set (added)? I
> have
> a highly convective problem where I ask myself what's better, keep
> lots
> of explicit zeros to rescue constant non-zero pattern or eliminate the
> near-zero entries.
> Dominik
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAks7EMAACgkQ/EBMh9bUuzJdyQCfSg2aGnJKfgg1QI9FBLBL8jBu
prYAoNV08lipWo/SSYrL9nTHxfPfQcV5
=ilAT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list