Off topic - Some advice on solving Navier-Stokes with FiniteDifference

Stephen Wornom stephen.wornom at sophia.inria.fr
Wed Aug 12 10:39:20 CDT 2009


Matthew Knepley wrote:
> 1) You should really handle this by creating the constant vector on 
> the pressure
>      space and using MatNullSpaceCreate()
>
> 2) You can also easily handle this by fixing the pressure at one point
At what indices or location does one fix the pressure? What value is it 
set. Usually pressure is part of the solution. It would seem to 
introduce an inconsistency.
I would like to understand how to do it.
Stephen

>
>   Matt
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:19 AM, William A. Perkins 
> <william.perkins at pnl.gov <mailto:william.perkins at pnl.gov>> wrote:
>
>
>     Stephen,
>
>     There are two ways that I know of to deal with pressure checker
>     boarding: staggered grids or some form of Rhie-Chow interpolation.
>     IMO, these are simple only for uniform, Cartesian grids.  For grids
>     that are curvilinear, unstructured, non-uniform, and/or
>     non-orthogonal, things get real complicated. There may be other
>     methods, but something is required.
>
>     Regarding boundary conditions, I would suggest this text book:
>
>        H. K. Versteeg and W. Malalasekera. An Introduction to
>        Computational Fluid Dynamics, the Finite Volume Method. 2nd
>        edition. Prentice-Hall. 2007
>
>     While this book uses the finite volume method, the explanation of
>     boundary conditions and staggered grids is very good and relatively
>     easy to interpret for finite difference.  I would also recommend
>
>        Joel H. Ferziger and Milovan Peric. Computational Methods for
>        Fluid Dynamics. Springer-Verlag, 3rd edition, 2002.
>
>     This is a little more general with regard to method discussing finite
>     difference and finite volume, but still settling on finite volume.
>
>     My $0.02: I question the use of finite difference.  For Navier-Stokes,
>     the use of finite volume is much more prevalent in commercial and
>     research codes.  If your student follows Versteeg and Malalasekera a
>     simple, working, staggered grid FV code could be built in a very short
>     time.  If something more complicated is needed, it's probably
>     explained in Ferziger and Peric.
>
>     Also My $0.02: Unless the point of your student's work is to
>     experience building her own code, why not download something like
>     OpenFOAM (http://www.opencfd.co.uk/openfoam/) and just use it?  I
>     expect the effort to learn something like OpenFOAM for a simple
>     application will be much less than writing a new code.
>
>     Hope this helps.
>
>     Bill
>
>     >>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen Wornom <stephen.wornom at sophia.inria.fr
>     <mailto:stephen.wornom at sophia.inria.fr>> writes:
>
>        Stephen> Shengyong wrote:
>        >> Hi, Farshid
>        >>
>        >> Maybe she should use the staggered grid method which is very
>     simple to
>        >> implement.
>        Stephen> Does it remain simple for curvilinear meshes?
>        Stephen> Stephen
>        >>
>        >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Farshid Mossaiby
>     <mossaiby at yahoo.com <mailto:mossaiby at yahoo.com>
>        >> <mailto:mossaiby at yahoo.com <mailto:mossaiby at yahoo.com>>> wrote:
>        >>
>        >> Hi all,
>        >>
>        >> Sorry for this off-topic post.
>        >>
>        >> I am helping a master studnet which is working on solving
>        >> Navier-Stokes equation with Finite Difference method. She is
>        >> trying to eliminate spourious pressure modes from the solution.
>        >> She needs to know some details that are not usually found in the
>        >> papers but important when programming, e.g. boundary
>     condition for
>        >> pressure. If someone has expertise on this or know a *simple* FD
>        >> code, I would be thankful to let me know.
>        >>
>        >> Best regards,
>        >> Farshid Mossaiby
>        >>
>        >>
>        >>
>        >>
>        >>
>        >>
>        >> --
>        >> Pang Shengyong
>        >> Solidification  Simulation Lab,
>        >> State Key Lab of  Mould & Die Technology,
>        >> Huazhong Univ. of Sci. & Tech. China
>
>
>     --
>     Bill Perkins
>     Research Engineer
>     Hydrology Group
>
>     Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
>     902 Battelle Boulevard
>     P.O. Box 999, MSIN K9-36
>     Richland, WA  99352 USA
>     Tel:  509-372-6131
>     Fax: 509-372-6089
>     william.perkins at pnl.gov <mailto:william.perkins at pnl.gov>
>     www.pnl.gov <http://www.pnl.gov>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their 
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which 
> their experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener



More information about the petsc-users mailing list