Direct LU solver
Matthew Knepley
knepley at gmail.com
Fri Feb 29 09:14:20 CST 2008
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 8:23 AM, <Amit.Itagi at seagate.com> wrote:
> Matt/Hong/Satish,
>
> My toy-problem would run with the command line options. However, the
> in-code options were still giving a problem. I also found that I had a
> Petsc version compiled with the debugging flag off. On recompiling Petsc by
> turning the debugging flag on, the in-code options worked. I am wondering
> about the cause for this behavior.
I am sure this is a misinterpretation. The code just does not work that way.
Something you have not notices changed between those versions of your code.
When you say "giving a problem", I assume you mean the option does not take
effect. The most common cause is a misunderstanding of the mechanism. If you
call a function to set something, but subsequently call
SetFromOptions(), it will
be overridden by command line arguments
Matt
> Thanks for your help. I will now fiddle around with the actual application.
>
> Rgds,
> Amit
--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
their experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list