DA question
Amit.Itagi at seagate.com
Amit.Itagi at seagate.com
Thu Apr 10 08:10:34 CDT 2008
Randy/Sean/Matt,
Thanks for the suggestions. I will try to implement the algorithm on the
suggested lines.
Rgds,
Amit
Randall Mackie
<rlmackie862 at gmai
l.com> To
Sent by: petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov
owner-petsc-users cc
@mcs.anl.gov
No Phone Info Subject
Available Re: DA question
04/09/2008 06:44
PM
Please respond to
petsc-users at mcs.a
nl.gov
Amit,
I have a staggered grid with H defined along the edges and E as normals
across the block faces. So if you have l x m x n blocks, then you need
to define your DA as l+1, m+1, n+1, to handle the extra grid point you
need for the staggered grid. I use 3 degrees of freedom (for Hx, Hy, and
Hz), and all my local calculations just need the box stencil.
Randy
Sean Dettrick wrote:
> To elaborate on Matt's suggestion, a staggered grid/Yee mesh code
> could use a single DA with one degree-of-freedom per component of H
> and E. The extra overlap required for staggered guard cells at the
> domain boundaries could be dealt with by having a bigger-than-usual
> stencil width. For the 2nd order 3D case, this suggests the
> DACreate3d routine would have arguments dof=6, s=2, and
> stencil_type=DA_STENCIL_STAR.
>
> It is just a suggestion - I have not tried it.
>
> Sean
>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:06 PM, <Amit.Itagi at seagate.com> wrote:
>> Randy,
>>
>> I guess, since you are doing a frequency domain calculation, you
eventually
>> end up with a single matrix equation.
>>
>> I am planning to work in the time domain. Will that change things ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Rgds,
>> Amit
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Randall Mackie
>> <rlmackie862 at gmai
>> l.com>
To
>>
>> Sent by: petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov
>> owner-petsc-users
cc
>> @mcs.anl.gov
>> No Phone Info
Subject
>> Available Re: DA question
>>
>>
>> 04/09/2008 04:09
>>
>>
>> PM
>>
>>
>> Please respond to
>> petsc-users at mcs.a
>> nl.gov
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Amit,
>>
>> Why do you need two staggered grids? I do EM finite difference
frequency
>> domain modeling on a staggered grid using just one DA. Works perfectly
>> fine.
>> There are some grid points that are not used, but you just set them to
zero
>> and put a 1 on the diagonal of the coefficient matrix.
>>
>>
>> Randy
>>
>>
>> Amit.Itagi at seagate.com wrote:
>> > Hi Berend,
>> >
>> > A detailed explanation of the finite difference scheme is given here
:
>> >
>> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finite-difference_time-domain_method
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > Rgds,
>> > Amit
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> > Berend van Wachem
>>
>> > <berend at chalmers.
>>
>> > se>
>> To
>> > Sent by: petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov
>>
>> > owner-petsc-users
>> cc
>> > @mcs.anl.gov
>>
>> > No Phone Info
>> Subject
>> > Available Re: DA question
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> > 04/09/2008 02:59
>>
>> > PM
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Please respond to
>>
>> > petsc-users at mcs.a
>>
>> > nl.gov
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Dear Amit,
>> >
>> > Could you explain how the two grids are attached?
>> > I am using multiple DA's for multiple structured grids glued
together.
>> > I've done the gluing with setting up various IS objects. From the
>> > multiple DA's, one global variable vector is formed. Is that what you
>> > are looking for?
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> > Berend.
>> >
>> >
>> > Amit.Itagi at seagate.com wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Is it possible to use DA to perform finite differences on two
staggered
>> >> regular grids (as in the electromagnetic finite difference time
domain
>> >> method) ? Surrounding nodes from one grid are used to update the
value
>> in
>> >> the dual grid. In addition, local manipulations need to be done on
the
>> >> nodal values.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >>
>> >> Rgds,
>> >> Amit
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list