which solving methods is more efficient to my problem.

RenZhengYong renzhengyong at gmail.com
Sun Oct 7 07:30:51 CDT 2007

I have did some similar job.
Based on my results, the AMG method is optimal.

On 10/7/07, Yujie <recrusader at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, everyone
> I am using adaptive mesh refinement to solve a group of coupled
> steady-state linear PDEs. I will use PETSC as the solver.
> Did anyone have experience in such problem. I want to know which solving method is more efficient, including iterative method and preconditioner. Thanks a lot.
> Regards,
> Yujie

Zhengyong Ren
School of Info-physics and Geomatics Engineering
DiXue Building, 3-322#,
Central South University, Hunan Province,China.
Postal code: 410083
Email: renzhengyong at gmail.com
Tel: +086013787102372.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20071007/11ac2937/attachment.htm>

More information about the petsc-users mailing list