Makefile for compiling multiple source files
Vijay M
vijay.m at gmail.com
Mon May 14 10:54:48 CDT 2007
Satish,
Thanks for the reply. I modified your makefile (which is quite close
to what i had to start with) and when i run it, I get an error message
to the effect
mpif77 -c -fPIC -Wall -g -I/home/vijay/work/petsc
-I/home/vijay/work/petsc/bmake/linux-gnu-c-debug
-I/home/vijay/work/petsc/include -I/usr/include -o C.o C.F90
g77: C.F90: linker input file unused because linking not done
mpif77 -c -fPIC -Wall -g -o A.o A.f90
g77: A.f90: linker input file unused because linking not done
This is repeated for all source files. Hence when the linker command
is issued, there are no object files created in my local directory. I
observed this message previously and hence went through the manual cpp
route. Do i have to set some environment or configuration variable to
get this working ?
Vijay
On 5/14/07, Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 May 2007, Vijay M wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been trying to use PETSc for one of my projects lately and I was
> > wondering how to create the makefile to compile multiple source files
> > with and without PETSc calls in fortran efficiently. I am sure it is a
> > newbie question but I could not find much information about this
> > anywhere.
> >
> > For example, you could take 4 files. A.f90, B.f90 without petsc calls
> > and C.f90 and D.f90 with petsc calls. If I were to compile them I have
> > to use
>
> If C, D are PETSc sources, then they should be C.F90, D.F90 [not .f90
> sufix]
>
> >
> > f90 -c A.f90 -o A.o
> > f90 -c B.f90 -o B.o
> > cpp C.f90 -I<include dir> > Ctemp.f90
> > f90 -c Ctemp.f90 -o C.o
> > cpp D.f90 -I<include dir> > Dtemp.f90
> > f90 -c Dtemp.f90 -o D.o
> >
> > g77 <PETSC options> A.o B.o C.o D.o -o out.exe
>
> this assumes A.o has the main subroutine - if not - you should list
> the corresponding .o file first.
>
> >
> > PETSc is configured to use g77 as the linker in my server but since I
> > am compiling each file separately, I cannot quite use the linker
> > directly (It treats the source as a linker script). Is there a
> > simplified way to do this or have I missed something vital ?!
>
>
> I'm attaching a suitable PETSc makefile for your config.
>
> Satish
>
> > I would appreciate any kind of help you can provide. If you need more
> > information, let me know. Thanks.
> >
> > vijay
> >
> >
>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list