Help me!
Matthew Knepley
knepley at gmail.com
Tue May 8 08:44:02 CDT 2007
I am not sure I understand what you are asking. However, I would mail
George Karypis (author of both) with this question.
Thanks,
Matt
On 5/8/07, Niriedith Karina <niriedith at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks!
> but i read that for one number specifyc of elements parmetis is
> recommended..in my case i used a mesh with 8million ....
>
> But i read that the people recommended one quantity....
> I try to know waht quantity is....
>
> Thanks again :P
>
>
> On 5/8/07, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am fairly sure that Metis and ParMetis use the same serial partitioner,
> or
> > at least it is possible to do so. There are a lot of options, and the
> particular
> > choice will affect performance.
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > On 5/8/07, Niriedith Karina < niriedith at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Everybody! :D
> > >
> > > I used Metis and Parmetis for partitioning. And i see that metis is
> faster
> > > than parmetis , so my question is.. for what number of elements is more
> > > efficient use parmetis? ....
> > >
> > > my mesh is a tetrahedra...
> > >
> > > Thanks anyway!
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > The government saving money is like me spilling beer. It happens, but
> > never on purpose.
> >
> >
>
>
--
The government saving money is like me spilling beer. It happens, but
never on purpose.
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list