A 3D example of KSPSolve?

Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
Fri Feb 9 22:37:18 CST 2007


  What are all the calls for MatGetRow() for? They are consuming a
great deal of time. Is there anyway to get rid of them?

   Barry


On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Shi Jin wrote:

> Sorry that is not informative.
> So I decide to attach the 5 files for NP=1,2,4,8,16
> for 
> the 400,000 finite element case.
> 
> Please note that the simulation runs over 100 steps.
> The 1st step is first order update, named as stage 1.
> The rest 99 steps are second order updates. Within
> that, stage 2-9 are created for the 8 stages of a
> second order update. We should concentrate on the
> second order updates. So four calls to KSPSolve in the
> log file are important, in stage 4,5,6,and 8
> separately.
> Pleaes let me know if you need any other information
> or explanation.
> Thank you very much.
> 
> Shi
> --- Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > You really have to give us the log summary output.
> > None of the relevant
> > numbers are in your summary.
> > 
> >  Thanks,
> > 
> >    Matt
> > 
> > On 2/9/07, Shi Jin <jinzishuai at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear Barry,
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > > I actually have done the staging already.
> > > I summarized the timing of the runs in google
> > online
> > > spreadsheets. I have two runs.
> > > 1. with 400,000 finite elements:
> > >
> >
> http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pZHoqlL60quZeDZlucTjEIA
> > > 2. with 1,600,000 finite elements:
> > >
> >
> http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pZHoqlL60quZcCVLAqmzqQQ
> > >
> > > If you can take a look at them and give me some
> > > advice, I will be deeply grateful.
> > >
> > > Shi
> > > --- Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >   NO, NO, don't spend time stripping your code!
> > > > Unproductive
> > > >
> > > >   See the manul pages for
> > PetscLogStageRegister(),
> > > > PetscLogStagePush() and
> > > > PetscLogStagePop(). All you need to do is
> > maintain a
> > > > seperate stage for each
> > > > of your KSPSolves; in your case you'll create 3
> > > > stages.
> > > >
> > > >    Barry
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Shi Jin wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thank you.
> > > > > But my code has 10 calls to KSPSolve of three
> > > > > different linear systems at each time update.
> > > > Should I
> > > > > strip it down to a single KSPSolve so that it
> > is
> > > > > easier to analysis? I might have the code dump
> > the
> > > > > Matrix and vector and write another code to
> > read
> > > > them
> > > > > into and call KSPSolve. I don't know whether
> > this
> > > > is
> > > > > worth doing  or should I just send in the
> > messy
> > > > log
> > > > > file of the whole run.
> > > > > Thanks for any advice.
> > > > >
> > > > > Shi
> > > > >
> > > > > --- Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   Shi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >    There is never a better test problem then
> > > > your
> > > > > > actual problem.
> > > > > > Send the results from running on 1, 4, and 8
> > > > > > processes with the options
> > > > > > -log_summary -ksp_view (use the optimized
> > > > version of
> > > > > > PETSc (running
> > > > > > config/configure.py --with-debugging=0))
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   Barry
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Shi Jin wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi there,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am tuning our 3D FEM CFD code written
> > with
> > > > > > PETSc.
> > > > > > > The code doesn't scale very well. For
> > example,
> > > > > > with 8
> > > > > > > processes on a linux cluster, the speedup
> > we
> > > > > > achieve
> > > > > > > with a fairly large problem size(million
> > of
> > > > > > elements)
> > > > > > > is only 3 to 4 using the Congugate
> > gradient
> > > > > > solver. We
> > > > > > > can achieve a speed up of a 6.5 using a
> > GMRes
> > > > > > solver
> > > > > > > but the wall clock time of a GMRes is
> > longer
> > > > than
> > > > > > a CG
> > > > > > > solver which indicates that CG is the
> > faster
> > > > > > solver
> > > > > > > and it scales not as good as GMRes. Is
> > this
> > > > > > generally
> > > > > > > true?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I then went to the examples and find a 2D
> > > > example
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > KSPSolve (ex2.c). I let the code ran with
> > a
> > > > > > 1000x1000
> > > > > > > mesh and get a linear scaling of the CG
> > solver
> > > > and
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > super linear scaling of the GMRes. These
> > are
> > > > both
> > > > > > much
> > > > > > > better than our code. However, I think the
> > 2D
> > > > > > nature
> > > > > > > of the sample problem might help the
> > scaling
> > > > of
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > code. So I would like to try some 3D
> > example
> > > > using
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > KSPSolve. Unfortunately, I couldn't find
> > such
> > > > an
> > > > > > > example either in the
> > > > > > src/ksp/ksp/examples/tutorials
> > > > > > > directory or by google search. There are a
> > > > couple
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > 3D examples in the
> > > > src/ksp/ksp/examples/tutorials
> > > > > > but
> > > > > > > they   are about the SNES not KSPSolve. If
> > > > anyone
> > > > > > can
> > > > > > > provide me with such an example, I would
> > > > really
> > > > > > > appreciate it.
> > > > > > > Thanks a lot.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Shi
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> > > > > > > Finding fabulous fares is fun.
> > > > > > > Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite
> > > > travel
> > > > > > sites to find flight and hotel bargains.
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> > http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> > > > > 8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time
> > > > > with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime
> > shortcut.
> > > > > http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news
> > > > >
> > 
> === message truncated ===
> 
> 
> 
>  
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Finding fabulous fares is fun.  
> Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains.
> http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097




More information about the petsc-users mailing list