Comparing between a PETSc matrix and a standard fortran array in compressed row format
Ben Tay
zonexo at gmail.com
Thu Aug 2 23:24:15 CDT 2007
Hi,
I used 2 packages to solve my poisson eqn, which is part of my NS
unsteady solver. One is the NSPCG solver package which uses the
compressed row format to store the A matrix. The other is PETSc. I found
that using both solvers gave me similar answers for a number of time
step. However, after that, the answer will suddenly change drastically
for the PETSc case. This does not happen for the NSPCG solver.
For e.g. time step 1-315, oscillating airfoil case, pressure changes
smoothly, similar answers in both cases
at time=316, pressure changes from -3.22 to -3.2 for NSPCG, but pressure
changes from -3.21 to -60.2 for PETSc
This happens when I use HYPRE's AMG or PETSc's direct solver LU.
I have been trying to find out what's the cause and I can't find the
answer in debugging. I would like to compare the values of the matrix of
the 2 different solvers and see if there's any difference. However,
NSPCG's matrix is in compressed row format while PETSc's one is just an
address and it can't be viewed easily. Moreover, it's a big matrix so
it's not possible to check by inspection. I'm thinking of subtracting
one matrix by the other and find if it's zero. What's the best way to
solve this problem? Btw, I'm using fortran and there's no mpi
Thank you.
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list