a current state of python bindings
Barry Smith
bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
Wed Apr 25 18:49:54 CDT 2007
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using PETSc from Python. I read the post:
>
> http://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/web-mail-archive/lists/petsc-users/2006/08/msg00090.html
>
> I am currently using the petsc4py, but unfortunately, they don't seem
> to have uptodate webpage. The most recent version, that works with
> petsc 2.3.2 can be found here:
>
> http://cheeseshop.python.org/pypi/petsc4py/0.7.2
>
> However, there are some bindings inside the petsc tarball, but I
> didn't find any documentation for them - are they deprecated?
Yes.
>
> Also, I would like to create a debian package "python-petsc" with
> python bindings to petsc (and get it to debian main distribution), so
> I wanted to check with you, what the most advanced python bindigs
> actually are (and which I should package).
At this time we are recommending petsc4py.
Barry
>
> Thanks,
> Ondrej
>
>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list