petsc-users
Matthew Knepley
knepley at gmail.com
Mon Nov 20 11:20:19 CST 2006
Actually, I believe that this is the wrong question. One of the
motivations behind
PETSc is the lack of any theory indicating which solver/pc performs best with
which equation/discretization. The only options is to try them all. We make this
easy. You can set -ksp_type and -pc_type from the command line. If the
combination
will not work, you jsut get an error and keep going. We usually use a
shell script for
this.
Thanks,
Matt
On 11/20/06, sqbang <sqbang at 163.com> wrote:
> Dear sir:
> I would be most grateful if you could give me some suggestions on Petsc.
> I'm a new user. One question I met is which method should be used when
> solving FEM(finite element method)questions ? In detail,KSP gives several
> methods and a lot of precondition, how to combinate them to work
> effectively? Does there exist the cases that some specific combinations are
> forbidden?
> I would like to thank you for your generous help. Your prompt attention
> to this letter would be highly appreciated.
> I am looking forward to hearing from you.
> sd.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 你 邮 箱 里 居 然 有 积 分 , 这 你 知 道 吗 ?
> 邮 箱 积 分 居 然 能 换 20 元 钱 , 这 你 也 知 道 吗 ? 点 此 兑 换 20 元 >>
--
"Failure has a thousand explanations. Success doesn't need one" -- Sir
Alec Guiness
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list