[petsc-dev] have requests for MR review indicate time expected to complete

Munson, Todd tmunson at mcs.anl.gov
Wed May 25 11:00:06 CDT 2022

I guess one could use tags to indicate the complexity of the review?

I personally would like a weekly digest of MRs that I have been requested to review with clickable links.  The dashboard would also be helpful.

All the best, Todd.

From: petsc-dev <petsc-dev-bounces at mcs.anl.gov> on behalf of Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 10:57 AM
To: Barry Smith <bsmith at petsc.dev>
Cc: "petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov" <petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov>
Subject: Re: [petsc-dev] have requests for MR review indicate time expected to complete

On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 11:55 AM Barry Smith <bsmith at petsc.dev<mailto:bsmith at petsc.dev>> wrote:

  It would be nice if when people received MR review requests it indicated if the review was trivial and could be done in a minute or two. Then maybe quick ones could flow through the system faster.

  How do people 1) know first when they have things they should (or have been asked to) review and 2) know the list of things they should review at any point in time. I am interested in other people's work flows to see if I should adjust mine.

I get emails for review, but it would be nice if there was a dashboard at Gitlab where we could see what is pending for us.

Is there a way to indicate if a review is trivial or long?


What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20220525/949b7878/attachment.html>

More information about the petsc-dev mailing list