[petsc-dev] odd log behavior
Mark Adams
mfadams at lbl.gov
Tue May 17 06:17:35 CDT 2022
Can I get some advice on how to add/hack an event now into the reported
events?
I am noticing that all of the difference in my clean (warmed up) stage
comes for KSPSolve:
KSPSolve 144 1.0 *2.1745e+00* 1.0 7.50e+10 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00
0.0e+00 42 89 0 0 0 68 98 0 0 0 34511 52718 0 0.00e+00 0
0.00e+00 100
KSPSolve 144 1.0 *1.2275e+00* 1.0 7.50e+10 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00
0.0e+00 29 89 0 0 0 56 98 0 0 0 61138 * -nan* 0 0.00e+00 0
0.00e+00 100
Maybe it is easier for me to just run it twice and get my Landau numbers
from the full report and get KSPSolve numbers from the nan report.
(Not great for a reproducibility doc)
Thanks,
Mark
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 10:38 PM Mark Adams <mfadams at lbl.gov> wrote:
> Ok thanks,
>
> And looking at the actual tests that I am doing more carefully I am not
> seeing much difference in the numbers that I care about with or without the
> GPU timers.
>
> And FWIW, from a user experience point of view, having -log_view present
> you with a sea of nans by default is a bit disheartening for a first time
> user. And they have to send an email and we have to respond ....
>
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 9:36 PM Barry Smith <bsmith at petsc.dev> wrote:
>
>>
>> Mark,
>>
>> Yes, Jed has already asked for ways to select certain operations at
>> runtime that would get timed via the GPU timer. I am not sure of the ideal
>> way to handle it. One possibility is PetscLogGpuTimeEvent(event number)
>> which indicates events you want the time logged for. Another is
>> PetscLogGpuTimeObjectID(object ID) which indicates all events for a
>> particular object class would be logged. In either or both cases the
>> PetscLogGPUTime() calls would need to become smarter to determine when they
>> are turned on and off depending on the current state of the logging. Since
>> the events are nested and there can be multiple objects related to the
>> timings I don't have a clear plan in my mind.
>>
>> Barry
>>
>>
>> On May 16, 2022, at 7:31 PM, Mark Adams <mfadams at lbl.gov> wrote:
>>
>> I am not sure I understand the logic, we print the ratio of max/min.
>> I report max and look at the ratio to see if I might be catching some
>> load imbalance or whatever. Is there a problem with that workflow?
>>
>> I assume there is or you would not have done this, so can I add a method
>> that I think also has legitimate values?
>>
>> I did observe a 15% hit on my whole stage with the GPU timers but I would
>> still like to take my chances with:
>>
>> Landau Operator 29 1.0 1.1200e-02 1.0 4.54e+06 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00
>> 0.0e+00 3 0 0 0 0 40 4 0 0 0 405 509 0 0.00e+00 0
>> 0.00e+00 100
>> Landau Jacobian 15 1.0 7.8189e-03 1.0 4.54e+06 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00
>> 0.0e+00 2 0 0 0 0 28 4 0 0 0 580 731 0 0.00e+00 0
>> 0.00e+00 100
>> Landau Mass 14 1.0 3.3759e-03 1.0 0.00e+00 0.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00
>> 0.0e+00 1 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00e+00 0
>> 0.00e+00 0
>>
>> These methods require barriers at the end before they
>> call MatSetValuesCOO, which is like < 1% of these total matrix times, so I
>> trust the data w/o GPU times set.
>>
>> (The rest of the stage is the rest of the time step, which is mostly the
>> linear solver, and I guess that is where the 15% comes from but I have not
>> dug into it)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mark
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 11:06 AM Barry Smith <bsmith at petsc.dev> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Only KSPSolve, SNESSolve, TSSolve will have legitimate values.
>>> "High-level" functions like PtAP can be asynchronous (meaning the GPU
>>> returns to the CPU to do more stuff) before they are complete, hence their
>>> timings would be incorrect and so they must be labeled with a special
>>> marker and not have numbers for time.
>>>
>>> Jed reports a possible 10% smaller time for KSPSolve() in this mode in
>>> some of his runs, compared to timing correctly the inner operations, and
>>> thus feels it is the best default.
>>>
>>> Barry
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 27, 2022, at 10:08 AM, Mark Adams <mfadams at lbl.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 8:00 PM Barry Smith <bsmith at petsc.dev> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The current nan output has to be replaced to get the column alignment
>>>> correct, I just didn't feel like making that change also in the same MR.
>>>>
>>>> Something like Unknown or anything that fits in the column space
>>>> would be fine. It just means for the given run the timing numbers are not
>>>> meaningful/correct for those events.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Just a note, just about every event is NAN for me. My GAMG setup that is
>>> all CPU is NAN. High level functions like PtAP as well.
>>> That said, adding -log_view_gpu_time is fine. Not worth the churn.
>>>
>>>
>>>> This is to obtain the best meaningful results for the outer events per
>>>> Jed since timing the inner events accurately introduces extra time in the
>>>> outer events. That is it is not possible to have the best accurate times
>>>> for both inner events and outer events in the same run. So if you want to
>>>> compare KSPSolve timings, for example, you run as-is, it you want to
>>>> examine, low-level vector operations run also with -log_view_gpu_time but
>>>> know that the KSP times are higher than need be.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for the confusion.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 26, 2022, at 3:49 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 12:03 PM Mark Adams <mfadams at lbl.gov> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Well, Nans are a clear sign that something is very wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Barry chose them so that it could not be mistaken for an actual number.
>>>>
>>>> Matt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 11:52 AM Jacob Faibussowitsch <
>>>>> jacob.fai at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> There is an automatic warning that shows when you do run with
>>>>>> `-log_view_gpu_time`, but perhaps there should also be an automatic warning
>>>>>> when *not* running with it. It is unfortunate that NaN is the value printed
>>>>>> as this implies a bug but AFAIK it is unavoidable (Barry can say more on
>>>>>> this though).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jacob Faibussowitsch
>>>>>> (Jacob Fai - booss - oh - vitch)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > On Apr 26, 2022, at 09:48, Jose E. Roman <jroman at dsic.upv.es>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > You have to add -log_view_gpu_time
>>>>>> > See https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/merge_requests/5056
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Jose
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >> El 26 abr 2022, a las 16:39, Mark Adams <mfadams at lbl.gov>
>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> I'm seeing this on Perlmutter with Kokkos-CUDA. Nans in most log
>>>>>> timing data except the two 'Solve' lines.
>>>>>> >> Just cg/jacobi on snes/ex56.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Any ideas?
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> VecTDot 2 1.0 nan nan 1.20e+01 1.0 0.0e+00
>>>>>> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -nan -nan 0
>>>>>> 0.00e+00 0 0.00e+00 100
>>>>>> >> VecNorm 2 1.0 nan nan 1.00e+01 1.0 0.0e+00
>>>>>> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -nan -nan 0
>>>>>> 0.00e+00 0 0.00e+00 100
>>>>>> >> VecCopy 2 1.0 nan nan 0.00e+00 0.0 0.0e+00
>>>>>> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -nan -nan 0
>>>>>> 0.00e+00 0 0.00e+00 0
>>>>>> >> VecSet 5 1.0 nan nan 0.00e+00 0.0 0.0e+00
>>>>>> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -nan -nan 0
>>>>>> 0.00e+00 0 0.00e+00 0
>>>>>> >> VecAXPY 4 1.0 nan nan 2.40e+01 1.0 0.0e+00
>>>>>> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 -nan -nan 0
>>>>>> 0.00e+00 0 0.00e+00 100
>>>>>> >> VecPointwiseMult 1 1.0 nan nan 3.00e+00 1.0 0.0e+00
>>>>>> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -nan -nan 0
>>>>>> 0.00e+00 0 0.00e+00 100
>>>>>> >> KSPSetUp 1 1.0 nan nan 0.00e+00 0.0 0.0e+00
>>>>>> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -nan -nan 0
>>>>>> 0.00e+00 0 0.00e+00 0
>>>>>> >> KSPSolve 1 1.0 4.0514e-04 1.0 5.50e+01 1.0 0.0e+00
>>>>>> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 -nan 0
>>>>>> 0.00e+00 0 0.00e+00 100
>>>>>> >> SNESSolve 1 1.0 2.2128e-02 1.0 5.55e+05 1.0 0.0e+00
>>>>>> 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 72 56 0 0 0 100100 0 0 0 25 -nan 0
>>>>>> 0.00e+00 0 0.00e+00 0
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>>>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
>>>> experiments lead.
>>>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>>>
>>>> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
>>>> <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20220517/2c90de41/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list