[petsc-dev] VecNest

Pierre Jolivet pierre at joliv.et
Tue Jul 12 07:39:33 CDT 2022



> On 12 Jul 2022, at 2:32 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 1:17 PM Pierre Jolivet <pierre at joliv.et <mailto:pierre at joliv.et>> wrote:
> Hello,
> Could anyone help me understand what is going on in the following example, please?
> I have a VecNest.
> I either: a) initialize all values to 0.0, then set a specific part of the vector to nonzero or b) initialize a part of the vector to 0.0 and set the other part to nonzero.
> I don’t see why a) and b) produce different results.
> 
> $ ./ex1111 -pc_type fieldsplit -ksp_monitor_true_residual -ksp_converged_reason -fieldsplit_pc_type jacobi -ksp_pc_side right -ksp_view_final_residual -nest_subvec true 
>   0 KSP unpreconditioned resid norm 8.375635517980e-01 true resid norm 8.375635517980e-01 ||r(i)||/||b|| 1.000000000000e+00
>   1 KSP unpreconditioned resid norm 4.748816884247e-01 true resid norm 4.748816884247e-01 ||r(i)||/||b|| 5.669798875623e-01
>   2 KSP unpreconditioned resid norm 4.713006778679e-01 true resid norm 4.713006778679e-01 ||r(i)||/||b|| 5.627043784990e-01
>   3 KSP unpreconditioned resid norm 7.092979927129e-02 true resid norm 7.092979927129e-02 ||r(i)||/||b|| 8.468587144106e-02
>   4 KSP unpreconditioned resid norm 1.457836310255e-02 true resid norm 1.457836310255e-02 ||r(i)||/||b|| 1.740567992870e-02
>   5 KSP unpreconditioned resid norm 1.625040500524e-14 true resid norm 1.633468028779e-14 ||r(i)||/||b|| 1.950261595401e-14
> Linear solve converged due to CONVERGED_RTOL iterations 5
> KSP final norm of residual 1.63347e-14
> $ ./ex1111 -pc_type fieldsplit -ksp_monitor_true_residual -ksp_converged_reason -fieldsplit_pc_type jacobi -ksp_pc_side right -ksp_view_final_residual -nest_subvec false
>   0 KSP unpreconditioned resid norm 0.000000000000e+00 true resid norm 8.375635517980e-01 ||r(i)||/||b||            inf
> Linear solve converged due to CONVERGED_ATOL iterations 0
> KSP final norm of residual 0.837564
> 
> I find if I assemble the vector, I get the same answers. Will try to figure out what assembly is doing.

It’s probably reseting all these values https://petsc.org/main/src/vec/vec/interface/rvector.c.html#line511 <https://petsc.org/main/src/vec/vec/interface/rvector.c.html#line511>, which I believe are being used in VecNorm() inside VecNormalize().
I guess any call to VecNestSubVec() should invalidate those as well, otherwise we get wrong cached norms.
I will give this a go.

Thanks,
Pierre

>   Thanks,
> 
>     Matt
>  
> Thanks,
> Pierre
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
> 
> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20220712/7722b9b3/attachment.html>


More information about the petsc-dev mailing list