[petsc-dev] git worktree
Barry Smith
bsmith at petsc.dev
Tue May 18 18:39:39 CDT 2021
Scott,
My solution to working with multiple PETSc branches without the agonizing pain is git at gitlab.com:petsc/petscgitbash.git
One could argue it is too particular to Barry's specific workflow but perhaps it has ideas/code that can be stolen for others. It could also potentially be done using the gitlab python bindings and thus remove the direct use of the rest full interface. I have been using it for about a year and a half and probably for about six months it has been pretty robust and stable. A reminder of its approach
# An alias for git that manages working with multiple branches of PETSc from the command line
# This is specific to PETSc and not useful for any other respositories
#
# Replaces some actions that normally require cut-and-paste and/or (manually) opening the browser to gitlab.com
#
# + Sets the PETSC_ARCH based on the branch name
# + Preserves compiled code associated with the branch checked out when changing branches
# + Updates lib/petsc/conf/petscvariables with the branch values so, for example, you can compile in Emacs without knowing the PETSC_ARCH in Emacs
# + Creates new branches with the name ${PETSC_GIT_BRANCH_PREFIX}/DATE/yourspecificbranchname
# + Adds /release to branch name if created from release branch
# + Can checkout branches based on a partial branch name, if multiple branches contain the string it lists the possibilites
# + Submits branches to pipeline testing from the command line
# + Checks the current branches latest pipeline test results (and optionally opens the browser to the pipeline)
# + Opens new or current MR without cut and paste from the branches
#
# Oana suggested the idea to save waiting for code to recompile after changing branches and the use of touch
# to force code to not get recompiled unnecessarily. This inspired this script which then grew uncontrollably.
#
# Does NOT change the source code in any way, only touches the object files
#
# Does not currently have a mechanism for multiple PETSC_ARCH for a single branch
#
# Requires git higher than 1.8 TODO: add a check for this
#
# Usage:
# git checkout partialname
# git checkout - check out the last branch you were on
# git checkout -b newbranchname [rootbranch] [message] adds ${PETSC_GIT_BRANCH_PREFIX}, date, and /release (when needed) to new base branch name
# The message can contain what the branch is for and who inspired it
# git checkout -b newbranchname [main or release]
# git pl [partialname] run a GitLab pipeline
# git cpl [-show] [partialname] check on status of pipeline
# git mr [-f] [partialname] open new or current MR for current branch, -f allows MR without first submitting pipeline
# git branch -D[D] [partialname] deletes branch you may be currently in, extra D deletes remote also
# git rebase [partialname] pulls main or release as appropriate and then rebases against it
# git branches lists branches in MR, in MR as WIP, tested but not in MR and not merged in main with pipeline results
# git push [-f] [partialname] pushes branch
# git fixup commit changes and rebase as fixup in the current branch and force push resul
# git mrfixup rebases branch as fixup to remove all commits applied by MR with Apply suggestion
# git cherry newbranchname [release] removes the most recent commit from the current branch and puts it in a new branch off of main [or release]
# git pop go to previous branch, before git checkout (like - except handles multiple branch changes in the script)
# git diff do git diff HEAD~1
#
# cizappipeline delete all the blocked/manual MR pipelines (appears to only work for project owners?
# cibuild url [-show] login into the test machine and build the PETSc version being tested
#
> On May 18, 2021, at 5:40 PM, Scott Kruger <kruger at txcorp.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Relatively recently, I learned about the git worktree feature and
> attached my write-up of how I use it in petsc. I have no idea whether
> the response will be:
>
> This has been around since 2015 at least, and you're just now
> finding out about it? LOL!
>
> or:
>
> I can't believe I never heard about it either!
>
>
> Since Patrick recently talked about shallow clones with git on slack, I
> suspect it's the latter (and I didn't hear about this feature from petsc
> dev's which is where I typically gain all my git knowledge). Basically,
> if you have more than one clone of petsc on your drive, you'll be
> interested in the worktree feature.
>
> The reason why the write-up is a bit long boils down the fact that we
> have the `/` in our branch names. It makes things a bit more
> complicated compared to my other projects (but is nice for the directory
> structure). I have not scripted away the complexity either -- I haven't
> reached that level of annoyance.
>
> The reason why I just don't have the rst file as an MR, is because the
> way I have it point to an existing branch seems cumbersome. Perhaps a
> git guru knows an easier way with some type of detached state or faster
> way of getting the HEAD to point to the right sha in one go. I'd be
> very interested if someone knows a better method.
>
> Scott
>
>
> --
> Scott Kruger
> Tech-X Corporation kruger at txcorp.com
> 5621 Arapahoe Ave, Suite A Phone: (720) 466-3196
> Boulder, CO 80303 Fax: (303) 448-7756
> <git-worktree.rst>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list