[petsc-dev] Case TS005062693 - XLF: ICE in xlfentry compiling a module with 358 subroutines
Satish Balay
balay at mcs.anl.gov
Tue Mar 16 16:53:01 CDT 2021
Great! I created MR with the current changes
https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/merge_requests/3723
Satish
On Tue, 16 Mar 2021, Jacob Faibussowitsch wrote:
> Satish your branch built successfully.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jacob Faibussowitsch
> (Jacob Fai - booss - oh - vitch)
> Cell: (312) 694-3391
>
> > On Mar 16, 2021, at 16:37, Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > hm - generatefortranstubs is not useful for the custom stubs.
> >
> > From them - I would:
> > - in the first pass - remove all 'use' statements
> > - iterate:
> > * run a build
> > * add 'import' for types that give build errors
> >
> > But I think its best to do this after the 2 MRs that change fortran interfaces are (reviewed/)merged in.
> >
> > Sure - its would be better to automate the search for t<Type>
> > declarations in PETSc. bfort reads in lib/petsc/conf/bfort-petsc.txt -
> > so perhaps generatefortranstubs can also use this data..
> >
> > Satish
> >
> > On Tue, 16 Mar 2021, Jacob Faibussowitsch wrote:
> >
> >> Alternatively generatefortranstubs can traipse through src/<mansec>/f90-mod/petsc<mansec>.h90 and look for type t<petscClass> definitions and build a list of petsc types that way, but at that point we’re halfway to writing our own compiler.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> Jacob Faibussowitsch
> >> (Jacob Fai - booss - oh - vitch)
> >> Cell: (312) 694-3391
> >>
> >>> On Mar 16, 2021, at 16:23, Jacob Faibussowitsch <jacob.fai at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> So I have hit a bit of a wall. I am able to pull out all of the types for a subroutine declaration but I cannot determine which types are classes since those are the ones that need to be imported. For example:
> >>>
> >>> subroutine PetscMatlabEngineDestroy(a,z)
> >>> PetscMatlabEngine a ! PetscMatlabEngine
> >>> PetscErrorCode z
> >>> end subroutine PetscMatlabEngineDestroy
> >>>
> >>> Is compiles completely fine but
> >>>
> >>> subroutine PetscRandomDestroy(a,z)
> >>> PetscRandom a ! PetscRandom
> >>> PetscErrorCode z
> >>> end subroutine PetscRandomDestroy
> >>>
> >>> Requires an “import tPetscRandom”. Previously both of these had “import petscsys” stuck in them.
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>>
> >>> Jacob Faibussowitsch
> >>> (Jacob Fai - booss - oh - vitch)
> >>> Cell: (312) 694-3391
> >>>
> >>>> On Mar 16, 2021, at 16:13, Satish Balay via petsc-dev <petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov <mailto:petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov> <mailto:petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov <mailto:petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> And with this change (alone) - the time to compile the f90 modules went (on pj01 testbox) from:
> >>>>
> >>>> 0m48.676s
> >>>> to
> >>>> 0m15.053s
> >>>>
> >>>> Satish
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, 16 Mar 2021, Satish Balay via petsc-dev wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Ah - the issue is 'import IS' vs 'import tIS'
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Pushed a fix now. [and reverted my earlier source split change]. My build goes through fine now.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Satish
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, 16 Mar 2021, Barry Smith wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Satish,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The import tIS might only work because the IS is already defined in the same file so the compiler can pull in just part of the use petscisdefdummy ? If the original module that contains the PetscRandom is in a different file then I don't see how the compiler can find and import PetscRandom. Is there a version of import where you also list the module (file) that the beast is from so the compiler can get it from that module?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Barry
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Do both the manually generated petsc*mod.F90 and the automatically generated files need to be switched to not use use everywhere? Or is it enough just to fix the manual ones for now and not mess with sowing?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mar 16, 2021, at 2:34 PM, Satish Balay via petsc-dev <petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov <mailto:petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov> <mailto:petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov <mailto:petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, 16 Mar 2021, Satish Balay via petsc-dev wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Tue, 16 Mar 2021, Jacob Faibussowitsch wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Ok something I have gotten to work, but only doing things by hand in petscvecmod.F90:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> diff --git a/src/vec/f90-mod/petscvecmod.F90 b/src/vec/f90-mod/petscvecmod.F90
> >>>>>>>>> index 0c447156b9..ef3e2e2e55 100644
> >>>>>>>>> --- a/src/vec/f90-mod/petscvecmod.F90
> >>>>>>>>> +++ b/src/vec/f90-mod/petscvecmod.F90
> >>>>>>>>> module petscisdef
> >>>>>>>>> use petscisdefdummy
> >>>>>>>>> interface operator(.ne.)
> >>>>>>>>> function isnotequal(A,B)
> >>>>>>>>> - use petscisdefdummy
> >>>>>>>>> + import tIS
> >>>>>>>>> logical isnotequal
> >>>>>>>>> type(tIS), intent(in) :: A,B
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> generatefortranstubs.py has some hakey parsing code. I guess it can be updated to do this.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> i.e - look for 'type(tIS)' and add 'import tIS'
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I pushed changes to generatefortranstubs.py for this (to
> >>>>>>> balay/reorg-f90-for-xlf branch). But there are errors. (I don't completely understand this issue yet)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> FC arch-linux-c-debug/obj/sys/f90-mod/petscsysmod.o
> >>>>>>> /home/balay/petsc/include/../src/sys/f90-mod/ftn-auto-interfaces/petscsys.h90:6:19:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 6 | import PetscRandom
> >>>>>>> | 1
> >>>>>>> Error: Cannot IMPORT ‘type’ from host scoping unit at (1) - does not exist.
> >>>>>>> /home/balay/petsc/include/../src/sys/f90-mod/ftn-auto-interfaces/petscsys.h90:7:26:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 7 | PetscRandom a ! PetscRandom
> >>>>>>> | 1
> >>>>>>> Error: Derived type ‘tpetscrandom’ at (1) is being used before it is defined
> >>>>>>> <<<<
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Satish
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> end function isnotequal
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> This works for everything wrapped in a module which contains an interface block. For dangling functions the following works:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hm - maybe these are only on the custom side [and not ftn-auto side]
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Satish
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> function isnotequal(A,B)
> >>>>>>>>> - use petscisdefdummy
> >>>>>>>>> + use petscisdef, only: tIs
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> logical isnotequal
> >>>>>>>>> type(tIS), intent(in) :: A,B
> >>>>>>>>> isnotequal = (A%v .ne. B%v)
> >>>>>>>>> end function isnotequal
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Do our fortran stub generators have any notion of types? Specifically types that originate from petsc?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Jacob Faibussowitsch
> >>>>>>>>> (Jacob Fai - booss - oh - vitch)
> >>>>>>>>> Cell: (312) 694-3391
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Mar 16, 2021, at 11:11, Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov <mailto:balay at mcs.anl.gov> <mailto:balay at mcs.anl.gov <mailto:balay at mcs.anl.gov>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 16 Mar 2021, Jacob Faibussowitsch wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> My [partial] change is in branch balay/reorg-f90-for-xlf
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Satish is this branch pushed? I’d like to send it to the ibm folks to see if it works for them as well.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Sorry - pushed now. From what I remember - it didn't work.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Satish
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> They also added this extra follow up:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The change we did in the source files is to replace all the "use pet*" statements in all the Interface blocks with IMPORT statement.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The nature of this workaround is to reduce the number of symbols that the compiler have to create, which exceeded the limitation and caused ICE.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Every USE statement in an interface block opens up the module symbol file and reads all the symbols from it and creates an entity for each symbol in compiler. This is unnecessary when the module already has the same USE statement in the module scope. Instead, users can use IMPORT statement to make the module symbols accessible inside interface face blocks.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> With the change, the compiler would only read the module symbol file once and create one set of symbols where the old code reads the module symbol files as many times as the number of the USE statements in Interface blocks and create that many sets of duplicate symbols. Replacing those USE statements with IMPORT statements also shortens the compile time significantly.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Jacob Faibussowitsch
> >>>>>>>>>>> (Jacob Fai - booss - oh - vitch)
> >>>>>>>>>>> Cell: (312) 694-3391
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 3, 2021, at 13:43, Satish Balay via petsc-dev <petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov <mailto:petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov> <mailto:petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov <mailto:petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The only change I can get working (i.e avoid compile errors) is to split petscvecmod.F90 into 2 source files - but I don't know if this will help with xlf..
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> My [partial] change is in branch balay/reorg-f90-for-xlf
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Satish
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 3 Mar 2021, Satish Balay via petsc-dev wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 3 Mar 2021, Satish Balay via petsc-dev wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure - once any change works locally [for gcc and xlf]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> When I try - I get a bunch of errors.. [yet to digest them.]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please give the following source code workaround a try?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since there is already "use petscvecdefdummy" at the module scope, one workaround might be to remove the unnecessary "use petscvecdefdummy" in vecnotequal and vecequals
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and all similar procedures.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, the test case has:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> module petscvecdef
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use petscvecdefdummy
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> function vecnotequal(A,B)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use petscvecdefdummy
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> logical vecnotequal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type(tVec), intent(in) :: A,B
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vecnotequal = (A%v .ne. B%v)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> end function
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok - try this suggestion:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/src/vec/f90-mod/petscvecmod.F90 b/src/vec/f90-mod/petscvecmod.F90
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> index 0c447156b9..81968c7ca1 100644
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/src/vec/f90-mod/petscvecmod.F90
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/src/vec/f90-mod/petscvecmod.F90
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -77,7 +77,6 @@
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> use petscvecdefdummy
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> interface operator(.ne.)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> function vecnotequal(A,B)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - use petscvecdefdummy
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> logical vecnotequal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> type(tVec), intent(in) :: A,B
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> end function
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> FC arch-linux-c-debug/obj/vec/f90-mod/petscvecmod.o
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> /home/balay/petsc/src/vec/f90-mod/petscvecmod.F90:81:22:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 81 | type(tVec), intent(in) :: A,B
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> | 1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Error: Derived type ‘tvec’ at (1) is being used before it is defined
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> /home/balay/petsc/include/../src/vec/f90-mod/ftn-auto-interfaces/petscis.h90:2:10:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 | use petscvecdef
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> | 1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fatal Error: Cannot open module file ‘petscvecdef.mod’ for reading at (1): No such file or directory
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Satish
>
>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list