[petsc-dev] gcc 10

[Mark Adams]

yes,

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 3:56 PM Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 3:55 PM Mark Adams <mfadams at lbl.gov> wrote:
>
>> It's been fixed and it's in my F90 test.
>>
>
> Did you take out the -fallow_... ?
>
>   Matt
>
>
>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 3:54 PM Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 3:50 PM Mark Adams <mfadams at lbl.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 1:40 PM Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I don't know what failure you're referring to.  The C++ complex thing
>>>>> might have been a matter of the antique compiler.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The failure was fixed with -fallow_ .... but it gave warnings.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Mark, can you try Barry's fix, changing the declaration of
>>> PetscObjectSetName()?
>>>
>>>   Thanks,
>>>
>>>      Matt
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>> > Why did Mark have the gcc 10 failure on our example. Was it
>>>>> something with
>>>>> > did in it?
>>>>> >
>>>>> >    Matt
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 12:43 PM Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> You want this for PETSc or for external packages?  We add it for a
>>>>> bunch
>>>>> >> of external packages.  I've been building PETSc with
>>>>> gcc/gfortran-10 for
>>>>> >> months now.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> writes:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > Do we have gfortran from gcc 10 running anywhere? We need a check
>>>>> to
>>>>> >> enable
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >   -fallow-argument-mismatch
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > from configure. Should be as simple as compiling Fortran which has
>>>>> >> > PetscObjectSetName() in it.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >   Thanks,
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >       Matt
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > --
>>>>> >> > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>>>>> >> > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to
>>>>> which
>>>>> >> their
>>>>> >> > experiments lead.
>>>>> >> > -- Norbert Wiener
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <
>>>>> >> http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>>>>> > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
>>>>> their
>>>>> > experiments lead.
>>>>> > -- Norbert Wiener
>>>>> >
>>>>> > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <
>>>>> http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
>>> experiments lead.
>>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>>
>>> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
>>> <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>
> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
> <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20200713/0e8ff36b/attachment-0001.html>