[petsc-dev] Negative blocksize
Matthew Knepley
knepley at gmail.com
Wed Sep 4 11:15:55 CDT 2019
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 12:14 PM Václav Hapla via petsc-dev <
petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> Is there any reason why PetscLayoutSetUp couldn't guarantee blocksize >=
> 1? I don't like the negative value being there forever requiring all that
> PetscAbs business. It seems to me it just complicates things unnecessarily.
>
We are using -1 to indicate "never set", but I don't see any reason to keep
it after SetUp().
Matt
> Thanks,
> Vaclav
--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20190904/c7feedd5/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list