[petsc-dev] Is bitbucket less responsive than it use to be?

[Balay, Satish]

Any such issues with gitlab?

We are looking at migrating current jenkins tests to gitlab-ci. I
believe some features are not available if repo is hosted at bitbucket
or github. And in the future - some DOE ci utilities might be
available for petsc via gitlab-ci.

[but yeah - hosting choice is more then just CI]

Satish



On Tue, 14 May 2019, Hapla Vaclav via petsc-dev wrote:

> I have the same feeling. Some parts are fast, e.g. browsing through the Source. But browsing branches, traversing commits, changing between branches etc. is getting a pain. And it's like that in the campus with super fast connectivity, so I believe it's a server-side issue.
> 
> Whereas GitHub seems to be quickly responding consistently across different sections. But I don't have that much experience with e.g. PRs there.
> 
> Plus the mobile version of BitBucket is just a _joke_, at least on both Firefox and Chrome I have on my android phone (yeah, who would nowadays use their cellphones to do some work while traveling, right?). For example PR Comments are virtually unreadable. Mainly on Chrome it is usually overlaid by the menu which I can't get rid of. This works better in Firefox but also there the thread is squeezed into a very narrow column, so for thread depth > 4 or so it becomes unreadable again. I usually give up and reply once I'm at my laptop but that really really sucks.
> 
> Vaclav
> 
> > On 14 May 2019, at 17:34, Smith, Barry F. via petsc-dev <petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >  Could be they're digging their own grave.
> > 
> >  I seem to be spending more time waiting after each click when previously I recall it was virtually instantaneous?
> > 
> > 
>