[petsc-dev] SeqSBAIJ v. MPISBAIJ
Smith, Barry F.
bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
Sat Aug 3 18:55:04 CDT 2019
Pierre,
I have fixed this bug in https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/pull-requests/1941/fix-bug-in-matmpisbaijsetpreallocationcsr/diff
Thanks for reporting and especially providing the test case
Barry
> On Aug 1, 2019, at 6:49 PM, Smith, Barry F. via petsc-dev <petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
>
> Yes it is a bug, working on it now.
>
>
>> On Aug 1, 2019, at 9:13 AM, Pierre Jolivet via petsc-dev <petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> The attached example is a little confusing for me.
>> How come I don’t get the same matrix out-of-the-box?
>> For me, the “correct” matrix is the SeqSBAIJ, how can I get MatMPISBAIJSetPreallocationCSR to assemble the same matrix?
>> Do I have to resort to first assembling SeqSBAIJ matrices and then calling MatCreateMPIMatConcatenateSeqMat if I don’t want to play around with my input arrays?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Pierre
>>
>> <foo.c>
>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list